public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* sparse build breakage with 903c0c7cdc21f2ccb7562a7bbc70289c0c2b16ad
@ 2011-05-29  0:38 Dr. David Alan Gilbert
  2011-05-30  1:58 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert @ 2011-05-29  0:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kosaki.motohiro; +Cc: linux-kernel

Hi Kosaki,
  I'm getting a problem when running the current (5dbe0af47f8a8f968bac2991c3ec974c6e3eaabc)
kernel tree through sparse, and I think it's down to an
interaction between your commit

903c0c7cdc21f2ccb7562a7bbc70289c0c2b16ad sparse: define dummy BUILD_BUG_ON definition for sparse

and the __module_param_call code in moduleparam.h

The error is:
init/main.c:643:1: error: Syntax error in unary expression

core_param(initcall_debug, initcall_debug, bool, 0644);

this calls __module_param_call which is defined as:


#define __module_param_call(prefix, name, ops, arg, isbool, perm)       \
        /* Default value instead of permissions? */                     \
        static int __param_perm_check_##name __attribute__((unused)) =  \
        BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perm) < 0 || (perm) > 0777 || ((perm) & 2))  \
        + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(sizeof(""prefix) > MAX_PARAM_PREFIX_LEN);   \
        static const char __param_str_##name[] = prefix #name;          \
        static struct kernel_param __moduleparam_const __param_##name   \
        __used                                                          \
    __attribute__ ((unused,__section__ ("__param"),aligned(sizeof(void *)))) \
        = { __param_str_##name, ops, perm, isbool ? KPARAM_ISBOOL : 0,  \
            { arg } }

which ends up with a postprocessed line of:

static inline void __check_initcall_debug(void) {; }; static int __param_perm_check_initcall_debug __attribute__((unused)) = +; static const char __param_str_initcall_debug[] = "" "initcall_debug"; static struct kernel_param const __param_initcall_debug __attribute__((__used__)) __attribute__ ((unused,__section__ ("__param"),aligned(sizeof(void *)))) = { __param_str_initcall_debug, &param_ops_bool, 0644, __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(initcall_debug), typeof(bool)) ? 2 : 0, { &initcall_debug } };

Note the '+;' being assigned to __param_perm_check_initcall_debug

So I think your dummy BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO's needs to have a value:

The following diff seems to fix it, but I've not let
a fuller sparse run complete yet:

diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index fb0e732..953352a 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -671,8 +671,8 @@ struct sysinfo {
 
 #ifdef __CHECKER__
 #define BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n)
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e)
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e)
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (0)
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e) ((void*)0)
 #define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition)
 #else /* __CHECKER__ */
 




-- 
 -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    |       Running GNU/Linux       | Happy  \ 
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org |                               | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: sparse build breakage with 903c0c7cdc21f2ccb7562a7bbc70289c0c2b16ad
  2011-05-29  0:38 sparse build breakage with 903c0c7cdc21f2ccb7562a7bbc70289c0c2b16ad Dr. David Alan Gilbert
@ 2011-05-30  1:58 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
  2011-05-30 16:03   ` [PATCH] Fix BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO sparse breakage Dr. David Alan Gilbert
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2011-05-30  1:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux; +Cc: linux-kernel

(2011/05/29 9:38), Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> Hi Kosaki,
>   I'm getting a problem when running the current (5dbe0af47f8a8f968bac2991c3ec974c6e3eaabc)
> kernel tree through sparse, and I think it's down to an
> interaction between your commit
> 
> 903c0c7cdc21f2ccb7562a7bbc70289c0c2b16ad sparse: define dummy BUILD_BUG_ON definition for sparse
> 
> and the __module_param_call code in moduleparam.h
> 
> The error is:
> init/main.c:643:1: error: Syntax error in unary expression
> 
> core_param(initcall_debug, initcall_debug, bool, 0644);
> 
> this calls __module_param_call which is defined as:
> 
> 
> #define __module_param_call(prefix, name, ops, arg, isbool, perm)       \
>         /* Default value instead of permissions? */                     \
>         static int __param_perm_check_##name __attribute__((unused)) =  \
>         BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perm) < 0 || (perm) > 0777 || ((perm) & 2))  \
>         + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(sizeof(""prefix) > MAX_PARAM_PREFIX_LEN);   \
>         static const char __param_str_##name[] = prefix #name;          \
>         static struct kernel_param __moduleparam_const __param_##name   \
>         __used                                                          \
>     __attribute__ ((unused,__section__ ("__param"),aligned(sizeof(void *)))) \
>         = { __param_str_##name, ops, perm, isbool ? KPARAM_ISBOOL : 0,  \
>             { arg } }
> 
> which ends up with a postprocessed line of:
> 
> static inline void __check_initcall_debug(void) {; }; static int __param_perm_check_initcall_debug __attribute__((unused)) = +; static const char __param_str_initcall_debug[] = "" "initcall_debug"; static struct kernel_param const __param_initcall_debug __attribute__((__used__)) __attribute__ ((unused,__section__ ("__param"),aligned(sizeof(void *)))) = { __param_str_initcall_debug, &param_ops_bool, 0644, __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(initcall_debug), typeof(bool)) ? 2 : 0, { &initcall_debug } };
> 
> Note the '+;' being assigned to __param_perm_check_initcall_debug
> 
> So I think your dummy BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO's needs to have a value:
> 
> The following diff seems to fix it, but I've not let
> a fuller sparse run complete yet:
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index fb0e732..953352a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -671,8 +671,8 @@ struct sysinfo {
>  
>  #ifdef __CHECKER__
>  #define BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n)
> -#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e)
> -#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e)
> +#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (0)
> +#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e) ((void*)0)
>  #define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition)
>  #else /* __CHECKER__ */
>  

Hi David,

Right you are. Can you please send a formal patch and append following line?
	Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

Thanks.








^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Fix BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO sparse breakage
  2011-05-30  1:58 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
@ 2011-05-30 16:03   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert @ 2011-05-30 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro, akpm

BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO and BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL must return values, even in the CHECKER
case otherwise various users of it become syntactically invalid.

Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---

diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index fb0e732..953352a 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -671,8 +671,8 @@ struct sysinfo {
 
 #ifdef __CHECKER__
 #define BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n)
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e)
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e)
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (0)
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e) ((void*)0)
 #define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition)
 #else /* __CHECKER__ */
 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-30 16:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-29  0:38 sparse build breakage with 903c0c7cdc21f2ccb7562a7bbc70289c0c2b16ad Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-05-30  1:58 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-30 16:03   ` [PATCH] Fix BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO sparse breakage Dr. David Alan Gilbert

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox