From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932280Ab1EaSXD (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2011 14:23:03 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:51250 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752443Ab1EaSXB (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2011 14:23:01 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=hlqgHyt2nM+Oh3lwtacRptsGy/xd6UJI1Tgo1LLBebKUrDoNOQlMXJ57sQorR33Du4 /l1uIt63VWXjVZQZkfCLVK9X4dTmxHdQ5vUJ2uP/waTSZi8lt7z717ADPCxFsH8SOusD ciuqsbzvB9IMAH8bQyc6yMeNhemZLyg+Y73yM= Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 20:22:56 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Split up buffer handling from core code Message-ID: <20110531182252.GA5256@somewhere.redhat.com> References: <1305767185-5771-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1305827704-5607-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1305827704-5607-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:55:04PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > And create the internal perf events header. > > v2: Keep an internal inlined perf_output_copy() > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: Borislav Petkov > Cc: Stephane Eranian > --- Are you guys fine with his patch? If so, should I queue it myself and send a pull request? I prefer to work step by step on this split, to avoid too much review burden. And also a single detail can require to rework the whole.