From: lkml@pengaru.com
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, miklos <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: bdi_min_ratio never shrinks, ultimately preventing valid setting of min_ratio
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:32:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110602183244.GB5753@shells.gnugeneration.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307015011.2497.633.camel@laptop>
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:43:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> It really helps if you CC the relevant people.
>
> On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 19:28 -0500, lkml@pengaru.com wrote:
> > mm/page-writeback.c
> > There is a static global bdi_min_ratio used for policing the setting of
> > per-bdi min_ratio's, to ensure the sum doesn't cross 100.
> >
> > There is no place in this listing where the value is decremented by the
> > respective bdi's min_ratio when a bdi is torn down.
>
> There is, adding a negative number is equal to a subtraction.
>
> min_ratio -= bdi->min_ratio;
> if (bdi_min_ratio + min_ratio < 100) {
> bdi_min_ratio += min_ratio;
> bdi->min_ratio += min_ratio;
> }
>
> is the relevant piece, note that bdi->min_ratio is the current setting,
> this makes min_ratio the difference between the new and old setting, and
> adding this to both bdi_min_ratio (the global sum) and bdi->min_ratio
> dtrt regardless if the new value is larger or smaller than the old
> value.
This accounts for the repeated setting of min_ratio on the same bdi. But
does bdi_set_min_ratio() get entered with a min_ratio of 0 on bdi removal?
If not, we leak the non-zero min_ratio of a removed bdi.
>
> > This looks like a bug
> > to me, and I have a situation where I'm unable to set a min_ratio to 1
> > where the sum of /sys/class/bdi/*/min_ratio does not add up to 100, which
> > is what triggered this investigation.
>
> Which of the two -EINVAL cases is triggered?
It's the bdi_min_ratio + min_ratio >= 100 case.
The system has many usb disks coming and going day to day, with their
respective bdi's having min_ratio set to 1 when inserted. It works for
some time until eventually min_ratio can no longer be set, even when the
active set of bdi's seen in /sys/class/bdi/*/min_ratio doesn't add up to
anywhere near 100.
This then leads to an unrelated starvation problem caused by write-heavy
fuse mounts being used atop the usb disks, a problem the min_ratio
setting at the underlying devices bdi effectively prevents.
Regards,
Vito Caputo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-02 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-01 0:28 bdi_min_ratio never shrinks, ultimately preventing valid setting of min_ratio lkml
2011-06-02 11:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-02 18:32 ` lkml [this message]
2011-06-02 21:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-08 0:13 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-08 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-08 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110602183244.GB5753@shells.gnugeneration.com \
--to=lkml@pengaru.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox