From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: reorganize drivers
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 15:08:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110605150807.0cb01ba0@stein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=5XLxcZiBcZT8W4Gh+Ph_BUjs-yw@mail.gmail.com>
On Jun 05 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 09:54, Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:13:28PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> >> > [repost: I had a typo on the spi-devel-general mailing list address]
> >> >
> >> > Sort the SPI makefile and enforce the naming convention spi_*.c for
> >> > spi drivers.
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> Though the spi_ prefix seems redundant considering the files are in
> >> 'spi' directory.
> >> Just a thought, no objection.
> >
> > When looking at the list of loaded modules (e.g. in an Oops message), the name
> > "spi_xilinx" is much more meaningful than just "xilinx", for example.
>
> Plus, when dropping the prefix, spi_xilinx.ko and gpio-xilinx.ko
> become the same...
In drivers/firewire/Makefile for example, there is this:
firewire-core-y += core-card.o core-cdev.o core-device.o \
core-iso.o core-topology.o core-transaction.o
firewire-ohci-y += ohci.o
firewire-sbp2-y += sbp2.o
firewire-net-y += net.o
Which is impractical though if there are more than a handful of drivers
involved.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-== -==- --=-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-05 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-05 7:18 [PATCH] spi: reorganize drivers Grant Likely
2011-06-05 7:43 ` Jassi Brar
2011-06-05 7:54 ` Baruch Siach
2011-06-05 11:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-05 13:08 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2011-06-05 20:55 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-05 21:19 ` Jassi Brar
2011-06-05 13:12 ` Jassi Brar
2011-06-05 20:57 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-05 8:13 ` Mika Westerberg
2011-06-05 14:37 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-06 9:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-06 9:08 ` Dominik Brodowski
2011-06-06 9:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-06 9:17 ` Jean Delvare
2011-06-06 9:29 ` James Bottomley
2011-06-06 11:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-06 12:16 ` Jean Delvare
2011-06-06 12:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-06 12:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-06 13:44 ` Stefan Richter
2011-06-06 15:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-06 10:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-06 14:39 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-06 15:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-05 7:13 Grant Likely
2011-06-07 9:28 ` Linus Walleij
2011-06-07 13:26 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110605150807.0cb01ba0@stein \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).