From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: RCU-protect __set_task_cpu() in set_task_cpu()
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:46:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110606164657.GA20752@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307351198.2353.7415.camel@twins>
On 06/06, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> You're right, p->pi_lock for wakeups, rq->lock for runnable tasks.
Good, thanks.
Help! I have another question.
try_to_wake_up:
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
if (!(p->state & state))
goto out;
cpu = task_cpu(p);
if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags))
goto stat;
This doesn't look a bit confusing, we can't trust "cpu = task_cpu" before
we check ->on_rq. OK, not a problem, this cpu number can only be used in
ttwu_stat(cpu).
But ttwu_stat(cpu) in turn does
if (cpu != task_cpu(p))
schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_wakeups_migrate);
Ignoring the theoretical races with pull_task/etc, how it is possible
that cpu != task_cpu(p) ? Another caller is try_to_wake_up_local(), it
obviously can't trigger this case.
This looks broken to me. Looking at its name, I guess nr_wakeups_migrate
should be incremented if ttwu does set_task_cpu(), correct?
IOW. Don't we need something like the (untested/ucompiled) patch below?
_If_ I am right, I can resend it with the changelog/etc but please feel
free to make another fix.
Oleg.
--- x/kernel/sched.c
+++ x/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2423,13 +2423,14 @@ static void update_avg(u64 *avg, u64 sam
#endif
static void
-ttwu_stat(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags)
+ttwu_stat(struct task_struct *p, bool migrate, int wake_flags)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
struct rq *rq = this_rq();
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ int cpu = task_cpu(p);
if (cpu == this_cpu) {
schedstat_inc(rq, ttwu_local);
@@ -2455,7 +2456,7 @@ ttwu_stat(struct task_struct *p, int cpu
if (wake_flags & WF_SYNC)
schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_wakeups_sync);
- if (cpu != task_cpu(p))
+ if (migrate)
schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_wakeups_migrate);
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS */
@@ -2630,6 +2631,7 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
{
unsigned long flags;
int cpu, success = 0;
+ bool migrate = false;
smp_wmb();
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
@@ -2637,7 +2639,6 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
goto out;
success = 1; /* we're going to change ->state */
- cpu = task_cpu(p);
if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags))
goto stat;
@@ -2674,13 +2675,15 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
p->sched_class->task_waking(p);
cpu = select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_WAKE, wake_flags);
- if (task_cpu(p) != cpu)
+ if (task_cpu(p) != cpu) {
set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
+ migrate = true;
+ }
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
ttwu_queue(p, cpu);
stat:
- ttwu_stat(p, cpu, wake_flags);
+ ttwu_stat(p, migrate, wake_flags);
out:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
@@ -2716,7 +2719,7 @@ static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct
ttwu_activate(rq, p, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, 0);
- ttwu_stat(p, smp_processor_id(), 0);
+ ttwu_stat(p, false, 0);
out:
raw_spin_unlock(&p->pi_lock);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-06 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-31 17:26 [PATCH] sched: RCU-protect __set_task_cpu() in set_task_cpu() Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-05-31 19:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-03 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-03 18:16 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-06-03 22:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-06-05 19:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-06 9:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 16:46 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-06-07 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-07 14:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-06 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-07 12:03 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix/clarify set_task_cpu() locking rules tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110606164657.GA20752@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox