From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] rcu: Detect rcu uses under extended quiescent state, and fix some
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:12:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110606181246.GM3066@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307329858-14999-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:10:53AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> I found two examples with the last two patches but I suspect there are more bugs
> waiting to be detected under other configs and/or archs.
Good catch!!!
Thanx, Paul
> Frederic Weisbecker (4):
> rcu: Detect uses of rcu read side in extended quiescent states
> nohz: Split extended quiescent state handling from nohz switch
> x86: Don't call idle notifier inside rcu extended QS
> x86: Call idle_exit() after irq_enter()
>
> arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/avr32/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/blackfin/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/microblaze/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/mips/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c | 4 +-
> arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/setup.c | 8 +++---
> arch/s390/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/sh/kernel/idle.c | 2 +-
> arch/sparc/kernel/process_64.c | 4 +-
> arch/tile/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/um/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/unicore32/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 6 ++--
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 3 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/threshold.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 5 +--
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 4 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 7 +++++-
> include/linux/lockdep.h | 8 ++++++-
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 20 ++++++++++++-----
> include/linux/tick.h | 10 ++++++--
> kernel/lockdep.c | 12 ++++++++--
> kernel/pid.c | 2 +-
> kernel/rcutree.c | 14 ++++++++++++
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 28 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.5.2
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-06 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-06 3:10 [PATCH 0/4] rcu: Detect rcu uses under extended quiescent state, and fix some Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-06 3:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-06 3:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] rcu: Detect uses of rcu read side in extended quiescent states Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-06 3:44 ` [1/4] " Milton Miller
2011-06-06 18:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-06 18:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-06 18:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-07 0:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-07 0:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-07 1:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-07 4:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-07 12:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-07 18:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-07 18:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-07 19:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-10 8:58 ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-06-06 3:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Split extended quiescent state handling from nohz switch Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-06 3:20 ` [PATCH 2/4 v2] " Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-06 3:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] " Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-08 1:15 ` Guan Xuetao
2011-06-06 15:16 ` [PATCH 2/4 v2] " Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2011-06-06 15:24 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-06 18:43 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-06-06 20:30 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-06-06 3:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] " David Miller
2011-06-09 23:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-06 3:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: Don't call idle notifier inside rcu extended QS Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-06 3:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: Call idle_exit() after irq_enter() Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-06 18:12 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110606181246.GM3066@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).