* Re: Status of function-sections work? [not found] <20110606011531.GA1887@leaf> @ 2011-06-07 8:11 ` Denys Vlasenko 2011-06-07 8:43 ` Josh Triplett 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Denys Vlasenko @ 2011-06-07 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Josh Triplett, linux-kernel On Monday 06 June 2011 03:15, Josh Triplett wrote: > Hello, > > I found your work in 2010 on using function-sections and data-sections > to eliminate unused code in the kernel. I'd like to make use of this > work to try to build an extremely space-constrained kernel. > > It looks like a few of your patches made it into the kernel, but most of > the linker script changes don't seem to have made it in. I wanted to > find out the status of this work. Do you still have this working? Do > you have versions of your patches for current Linux? parisc uses ^ in some identifiers. Therefore we need something like [A-Za-z0-9_$^]* in linker script. This wasn't working with GNU ld - ^ is not a valid char for pattern. Use of more general [!.]* was also impossible - ! is not a valid char too. Therefore I asked binutils people to fix this (they agreed) and decided to wait for a fixed binutils to be released. > Have you considered re-submitting? Yes, I need to do this... -- vda ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of function-sections work? 2011-06-07 8:11 ` Status of function-sections work? Denys Vlasenko @ 2011-06-07 8:43 ` Josh Triplett 2011-06-07 15:06 ` Denys Vlasenko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Josh Triplett @ 2011-06-07 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Denys Vlasenko; +Cc: linux-kernel On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:11:15AM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On Monday 06 June 2011 03:15, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I found your work in 2010 on using function-sections and data-sections > > to eliminate unused code in the kernel. I'd like to make use of this > > work to try to build an extremely space-constrained kernel. > > > > It looks like a few of your patches made it into the kernel, but most of > > the linker script changes don't seem to have made it in. I wanted to > > find out the status of this work. Do you still have this working? Do > > you have versions of your patches for current Linux? > > parisc uses ^ in some identifiers. Therefore we need something like > [A-Za-z0-9_$^]* in linker script. This wasn't working with GNU ld - > ^ is not a valid char for pattern. Use of more general [!.]* > was also impossible - ! is not a valid char too. > > Therefore I asked binutils people to fix this (they agreed) and > decided to wait for a fixed binutils to be released. Makes sense. Thanks for the explanation and status. Do you know if the fix has gone into binutils, either in a release or the latest snapshot from version control? If not, does a patch exist? - Josh Triplett ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of function-sections work? 2011-06-07 8:43 ` Josh Triplett @ 2011-06-07 15:06 ` Denys Vlasenko 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Denys Vlasenko @ 2011-06-07 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Josh Triplett; +Cc: linux-kernel On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:11:15AM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: >> On Monday 06 June 2011 03:15, Josh Triplett wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I found your work in 2010 on using function-sections and data-sections >> > to eliminate unused code in the kernel. I'd like to make use of this >> > work to try to build an extremely space-constrained kernel. >> > >> > It looks like a few of your patches made it into the kernel, but most of >> > the linker script changes don't seem to have made it in. I wanted to >> > find out the status of this work. Do you still have this working? Do >> > you have versions of your patches for current Linux? >> >> parisc uses ^ in some identifiers. Therefore we need something like >> [A-Za-z0-9_$^]* in linker script. This wasn't working with GNU ld - >> ^ is not a valid char for pattern. Use of more general [!.]* >> was also impossible - ! is not a valid char too. >> >> Therefore I asked binutils people to fix this (they agreed) and >> decided to wait for a fixed binutils to be released. > > Makes sense. Thanks for the explanation and status. > > Do you know if the fix has gone into binutils, either in a release or > the latest snapshot from version control? If not, does a patch exist? Yes, latest released binutils has the fix. -- vda ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-07 15:06 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <20110606011531.GA1887@leaf> 2011-06-07 8:11 ` Status of function-sections work? Denys Vlasenko 2011-06-07 8:43 ` Josh Triplett 2011-06-07 15:06 ` Denys Vlasenko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).