From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754959Ab1FHIyM (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 04:54:12 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:48658 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754487Ab1FHIyK (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 04:54:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:53:55 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andi Kleen , Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Readd asmregparm Message-ID: <20110608085355.GA1692@elte.hu> References: <1307495401-2631-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <20110608081957.GA14966@elte.hu> <20110608083750.GH27166@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110608083750.GH27166@one.firstfloor.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andi Kleen wrote: > > That's a totally useless changelog (you are deliberately hiding > > information again) so the series is obviously not acceptable. > > Please fix and resend. > > I reread it and it seems complete to me. Please be more specific. > > If you refer to the followon patchkit - it's not ready for posting > yet. [...] You contradict yourself here - why do you claim that it's "complete" while you readily admit in the *next* sentence that the "followon patchkit" (with no specifics provided whatsoever) is "not ready for posting yet"? You are not a newbie anymore, you know what the rules are for *everyone*: if it's not ready for posting yet then don't send a half-done series for inclusion, wasting everyone's time. > [...] However I believe these changes are reasonable cleanups that > are useful on their own. That's why I posted them now. Uhm, that's trivially untrue crazy talk and you should know it: the patches add code and typing complexity for no good stated reason whatsoever. If we want the maintenance overhead of that then you better come up with your deliberately kept secret "project" and we'll be able to weigh whether the benefits overweigh the maintenance costs ... In any case, i'd like to warn you that you are very close to me starting to ignore your mails summarily due to absymal low quality: in the past few months 70-80% of the cases your first patch submissions were trivially flawed, and in many cases you should have been well aware of the fact that they were trivially flawed. And that's not from a newbie but from a long-time kernel contributor! Thanks, Ingo