From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754076Ab1FHUkv (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:40:51 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:36215 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751141Ab1FHUkt (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:40:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:40:14 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Lukas Czerner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Paris , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NULL pointer dereference in inode_has_perm() while setquota Message-Id: <20110608134014.43ac448b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:35:51 +0200 (CEST) Lukas Czerner wrote: > I was running xfstests on ext4 filesystem and I have run into NULL > pointer dereference in inode_has_perm() while running test no. 234. This > is on kernel 3.0.0-rc1. Is this a regression? Was 2.6.39 OK? Thanks.