From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de,
Arne Jansen <lists@die-jansens.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] printk: Release console_sem after logbuf_lock
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:30:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110610093049.GG27280@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307652883.2497.1028.camel@laptop>
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > => only a 'there be dragons' mental marker
>
> Right, my reply was that I couldn't convince myself unlock order
> could make a difference, but clearly I can easily have missed
> something subtle.
>
> > and i have to say that when i found a boot lockup during testing
> > i was not surprised very much :)
>
> But you found a lockup on the second patch, not this one.
Yeah, it's not like my mental markers are overly precise! ;-)
> Also, this patch is important for #3, where we want to take
> logbuf_lock under the semaphore internal lock, that too would
> preclude us doing that up() in the old location.
Yeah. I'm not against it or anything (hey i suggested the whole
thing), but i'll be testing this through carefully.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-10 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-09 13:06 [PATCH 0/3] printk: Remove lockdep_off() and wakeups Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-09 13:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] printk: Release console_sem after logbuf_lock Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-09 20:06 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-09 20:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-09 20:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-09 21:07 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-09 23:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-06-10 0:08 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-10 9:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-10 9:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-10 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-10 11:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-10 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-10 12:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-10 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-10 12:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-23 19:03 ` Pavel Machek
2011-06-10 9:30 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-06-10 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-09 13:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] printk, lockdep: Remove lockdep_off() usage Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-10 13:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-09 13:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] printk: Avoid all wakeups from printk Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-09 13:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-09 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-09 13:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-09 14:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-09 14:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-09 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-09 15:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-09 15:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-09 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110610093049.GG27280@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@die-jansens.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox