public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: CFQ: async queue blocks the whole system
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:41:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110613214154.GL633@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DF5E1A8.7080100@tao.ma>

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 06:08:40PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:

[..]
> > You can also run iostat on disk and should be able to see that with
> > the patch you are dispatching writes more often than before.
> Sorry, the patch doesn't work.
> 
> I used trace event to capture all the blktraces since it doesn't
> interfere with the tests, hope it helps.

Actually I was looking for CFQ traces. This seems to be generic block
layer trace points. May be you can use "blktrace -d /dev/<device>"
and then blkparse. It also gives the aggregate view which is helpful.

> 
> Please downloaded it from http://blog.coly.li/tmp/blktrace.tar.bz2

What concerns me is following.

5255.521353: block_rq_issue: 8,0 W 0 () 571137153 + 8 [attr_set]
5578.863871: block_rq_issue: 8,0 W 0 () 512950473 + 48 [kworker/0:1]

IIUC, we dispatched second write more than 300 seconds after dispatching
1 write. What happened in between. We should have dispatched more writes.

CFQ traces might give better idea in terms of whether wl_type for async
queues was scheduled or not at all.

Thanks
Vivek

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-13 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-09 10:49 CFQ: async queue blocks the whole system Tao Ma
2011-06-09 14:14 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-09 14:34   ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-09 14:47   ` Tao Ma
2011-06-09 15:37     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-09 15:44       ` Tao Ma
2011-06-09 18:27         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-10  5:48           ` Tao Ma
2011-06-10  9:14             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-10 10:00               ` Tao Ma
2011-06-10 15:44                 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-11  7:24                   ` Tao Ma
2011-06-13 10:08                   ` Tao Ma
2011-06-13 21:41                     ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2011-06-14  7:03                       ` Tao Ma
2011-06-14 13:30                         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-14 15:42                           ` Tao Ma
2011-06-14 21:14                             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-17  3:04                   ` Tao Ma
2011-06-17 12:50                     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-17 14:34                       ` Tao Ma
2011-06-10  1:19       ` Shaohua Li
2011-06-10  1:34         ` Shaohua Li
2011-06-10  2:06           ` Tao Ma
2011-06-10  2:35             ` Shaohua Li
2011-06-10  3:02               ` Tao Ma
2011-06-10  9:20                 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-10  9:21                   ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-13  1:03                   ` Shaohua Li
2011-06-10  9:17         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-10  9:20           ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-10  9:29             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-10  9:31               ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110613214154.GL633@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tm@tao.ma \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox