From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755217Ab1FNIJg (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:09:36 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:40299 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754321Ab1FNIJe (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:09:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:09:15 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Suresh Siddha Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "trenn@novell.com" , "prarit@redhat.com" , "tj@kernel.org" , "rusty@rustcorp.com.au" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Song, Youquan" , "stable@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [patch v4 1/2] stop_machine: enable __stop_machine() to be called from the cpu online path Message-ID: <20110614080915.GD29900@elte.hu> References: <20110613175832.331826123@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com> <20110613175915.504721985@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com> <20110613195613.GA11196@elte.hu> <1307998158.2682.33.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com> <1307999142.2682.42.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1307999142.2682.42.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Suresh Siddha wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 13:49 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 12:56 -0700, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Suresh Siddha wrote: > > > > > > > include/linux/stop_machine.h | 11 +++-- > > > > kernel/stop_machine.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > > > 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > > > Btw., this is *way* too risky for a -stable backport. > > > > > > > Ingo, we can have a smaller patch (appended) for the -stable. How do you > > want to go ahead? Take this small patch for both mainline and -stable > > and the two code cleanup/consolidation patches for -tip (to go into > > 3.1?). Thanks. > > oops. sent it too soon. fixed a !CONFIG_SMP compilation issue. > Updated simple patch appended. See? It's by definition not a "simple" patch. Thanks, Ingo