From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
To: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 6] x86, UV: smp_processor_id in a preemptable region
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:52:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110615135213.GA29493@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinpqPhTNRtqPGnfZznefESwD19iXA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:05:17PM +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com> wrote:
> > From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
> >
> > Calling smp_processor_id() from within a preemptable region will issue
> > a warning if DEBUG_PREEMPT is set.
> >
> > Diffed against 3.0.0-rc3
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
> > ---
> > ?arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c | ? ?2 ++
> > ?1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > Index: linux/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
> > +++ linux/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
> > @@ -1334,7 +1334,9 @@ static ssize_t tunables_write(struct fil
> >
> > ? ? ? ?instr[count] = '\0';
> >
> > + ? ? ? preempt_disable(); /* avoid DEBUG_PREEMPT warning */
>
> I think above code comment, "avoid DEBUG_PREEMPT warning" should be to
> something more meaningful. It's a BUG, if smp_processor_id() is called
> within preemptible context. So, we don't want to hit that BUG.
I agree that calling smp_processor_id() within a preemptible context is
going to produce unpredictable results. In this particular case we just
need a valid cpu number so that we can find a per-cpu structure.
That structure contains a reasonable (sanity-checking) limit to the value
of the tunable that is being written.
It is possible that the found per-cpu structure could differ from cpu to
cpu. But if this tunable is thus caused to be set too high, a 'throttling'
upper bound will not be enforced. No other harm is done.
But yes, I should have noted that an ugly DEBUG_PREEMPT warning will
be the worst effect.
-Cliff
>
> > ? ? ? ?bcp = &per_cpu(bau_control, smp_processor_id());
> > + ? ? ? preempt_enable_no_resched();
> >
> > ? ? ? ?ret = parse_tunables_write(bcp, instr, count);
> > ? ? ? ?if (ret)
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at ?http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Cliff Wickman
SGI
cpw@sgi.com
(651) 683-3824
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-15 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-14 23:06 [PATCH 1 of 6] x86, UV: smp_processor_id in a preemptable region Cliff Wickman
2011-06-15 6:05 ` Rakib Mullick
2011-06-15 13:52 ` Cliff Wickman [this message]
2011-06-15 15:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-15 16:07 ` Cliff Wickman
2011-06-15 16:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-15 16:40 ` Cliff Wickman
2011-06-15 17:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 18:58 ` Cliff Wickman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110615135213.GA29493@sgi.com \
--to=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rakib.mullick@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox