From: cpw@sgi.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [patch 4/8 v4] x86, UV: correct reset_with_ipi()
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:10:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110616155353.012905844@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110616151032.729980001@gulag1.americas.sgi.com
[-- Attachment #1: tlb_uv_ipiresetpnode --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3108 bytes --]
Fix reset_with_ipi() to look up a cpu for a blade based on the
distribution map being indexed by the potentially sparsely numbered pnode.
This patch is critical to tlb shootdown on a partitioned UV system, or one
with nonconsecutive blade numbers.
Diffed against 3.0.0-rc3
Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
---
The distribution map bits represent pnodes relative to the partition base
pnode. Previous to this patch it had been assuming bits based on 0-based,
consecutive blade ids.
arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Index: linux/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
@@ -296,14 +296,18 @@ static void bau_process_message(struct m
}
/*
- * Determine the first cpu on a uvhub.
+ * Determine the first cpu on a pnode.
*/
-static int uvhub_to_first_cpu(int uvhub)
+static int pnode_to_first_cpu(int pnode, struct bau_control *smaster)
{
int cpu;
- for_each_present_cpu(cpu)
- if (uvhub == uv_cpu_to_blade_id(cpu))
+ struct hub_and_pnode *hpp;
+
+ for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
+ hpp = &smaster->thp[cpu];
+ if (pnode == hpp->pnode)
return cpu;
+ }
return -1;
}
@@ -366,23 +370,28 @@ static void do_reset(void *ptr)
* Use IPI to get all target uvhubs to release resources held by
* a given sending cpu number.
*/
-static void reset_with_ipi(struct bau_targ_hubmask *distribution, int sender)
+static void reset_with_ipi(struct bau_targ_hubmask *distribution,
+ struct bau_control *bcp)
{
- int uvhub;
+ int pnode;
+ int apnode;
int maskbits;
cpumask_t mask;
+ int sender = bcp->cpu;
+ struct bau_control *smaster = bcp->socket_master;
struct reset_args reset_args;
reset_args.sender = sender;
cpus_clear(mask);
/* find a single cpu for each uvhub in this distribution mask */
maskbits = sizeof(struct bau_targ_hubmask) * BITSPERBYTE;
- for (uvhub = 0; uvhub < maskbits; uvhub++) {
+ /* each bit is a pnode relative to the partition base pnode */
+ for (pnode = 0; pnode < maskbits; pnode++) {
int cpu;
- if (!bau_uvhub_isset(uvhub, distribution))
+ if (!bau_uvhub_isset(pnode, distribution))
continue;
- /* find a cpu for this uvhub */
- cpu = uvhub_to_first_cpu(uvhub);
+ apnode = pnode + bcp->partition_base_pnode;
+ cpu = pnode_to_first_cpu(apnode, smaster);
cpu_set(cpu, mask);
}
@@ -604,7 +613,7 @@ static void destination_plugged(struct b
quiesce_local_uvhub(hmaster);
spin_lock(&hmaster->queue_lock);
- reset_with_ipi(&bau_desc->distribution, bcp->cpu);
+ reset_with_ipi(&bau_desc->distribution, bcp);
spin_unlock(&hmaster->queue_lock);
end_uvhub_quiesce(hmaster);
@@ -626,7 +635,7 @@ static void destination_timeout(struct b
quiesce_local_uvhub(hmaster);
spin_lock(&hmaster->queue_lock);
- reset_with_ipi(&bau_desc->distribution, bcp->cpu);
+ reset_with_ipi(&bau_desc->distribution, bcp);
spin_unlock(&hmaster->queue_lock);
end_uvhub_quiesce(hmaster);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-16 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110616151032.729980001@gulag1.americas.sgi.com>
2011-06-16 15:10 ` [patch 1/8 v4] x86, UV: smp_processor_id in a preemptable region cpw
2011-06-16 15:10 ` [patch 2/8 v4] x86, UV: inline header file functions cpw
2011-06-16 15:10 ` [patch 3/8 v4] x86, UV: allow for non-consecutive sockets cpw
2011-06-16 15:10 ` cpw [this message]
2011-06-16 15:10 ` [patch 5/8 v4] x86, UV: rename hubmask to pnmask cpw
2011-06-16 15:10 ` [patch 6/8 v4] x86, UV: remove cpumask_t from the stack cpw
2011-06-16 15:10 ` [patch 7/8 v4] x86, UV: correct failed topology memory leak cpw
2011-06-16 15:10 ` [patch 8/8 v4] x86, UV: correct UV2 BAU destination timeout cpw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110616155353.012905844@sgi.com \
--to=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox