Re: [patch 03/16] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFS bandwidth tracking

Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-22T10:52:57Z

On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 00:16 -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> + {
> + .name = "cfs_quota_us",
> + .read_s64 = cpu_cfs_quota_read_s64,
> + .write_s64 = cpu_cfs_quota_write_s64,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "cfs_period_us",
> + .read_u64 = cpu_cfs_period_read_u64,
> + .write_u64 = cpu_cfs_period_write_u64,
> + },
> +#endif

Did I miss a reply to:
lkml.kernel.org/r/1305538202.2466.4047.camel@twins ? why does it make
sense to have different periods per cgroup? what does it mean?