From: Tom Lendacky <tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>,
habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, lguest@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux390@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
steved@us.ibm.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Shirley Ma <xma@us.ibm.com>,
roprabhu@cisco.com
Subject: Re: RFT: virtio_net: limit xmit polling
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:23:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201106211023.24643.tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110619102700.GA11198@redhat.com>
On Sunday, June 19, 2011 05:27:00 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> OK, different people seem to test different trees. In the hope to get
> everyone on the same page, I created several variants of this patch so
> they can be compared. Whoever's interested, please check out the
> following, and tell me how these compare:
I'm in the process of testing these patches. Base and v0 are complete
and v1 is near complete with v2 to follow. I'm testing with a variety
of TCP_RR and TCP_STREAM/TCP_MAERTS tests involving local guest-to-guest
tests and remote host-to-guest tests. I'll post the results in the next
day or two when the tests finish.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> kernel:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git
>
> virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/base - this is net-next baseline to test
> against virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/v0 - fixes checks on out of capacity
> virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/v1 - previous revision of the patch
> this does xmit,free,xmit,2*free,free
> virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/v2 - new revision of the patch
> this does free,xmit,2*free,free
>
> There's also this on top:
> virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/v3 -> don't delay avail index update
> I don't think it's important to test this one, yet
>
> Userspace to use: event index work is not yet merged upstream
> so the revision to use is still this:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/qemu-kvm.git
> virtio-net-event-idx-v3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-21 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-19 10:27 RFT: virtio_net: limit xmit polling Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-21 15:23 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2011-06-28 16:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2011-06-29 8:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-07-14 19:38 ` Roopa Prabhu
2011-07-17 9:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201106211023.24643.tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lguest@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roprabhu@cisco.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=steved@us.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xma@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox