From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5 v4] procfs: introduce hidepid=, hidenet=, gid= mount options
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:17:24 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110622101724.GA4278@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110622064545.GA3605@albatros>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:45 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> More generic solution (I'm not suggesting it, but merely discussing)
> would use some user-supplied set of files to restrict access to (or,
> better, the set of allowed files because white list is almost always
> better than black list). Maybe this one:
>
> mount -t proc -o "pid_allow=exe,status,comm,oom_*" proc /proc
>
> And without pid_allow it would behave like pid_allow=*.
> "pid_allow=."
> would deny access to the whole /proc/PID.
I mean "pid_allow=", of course.
> This would be a bit inconsistent with current permissions because e.g.
> if use pid_allow=environ then environ file would not be accessible
> because of posix permissions. Hierarchical mode (pid_allow=fd/1) is not
> allowed too.
For hierarchical mode: attr_allowed, tgid_allowed, tid_allowed.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-15 18:51 [RFC 0/5 v4] procfs: introduce hidepid=, hidenet=, gid= mount options Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-16 8:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-16 8:58 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-16 11:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-16 13:33 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-10-30 17:09 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-06-21 22:31 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-22 6:45 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-22 10:17 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2011-06-29 19:16 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-06 11:25 ` Alexey Dobriyan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110622101724.GA4278@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox