public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/22] KVM: MMU: mmio page fault support
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:13:19 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110623201319.GA19483@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E037E21.6010203@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 01:55:45AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 06/23/2011 10:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 
> >>> An spte does not have to contain the present bit to generate a valid EPT
> >>> misconfiguration (and an spte dump is still required in that case).
> >>> Use !is_mmio_spte() instead.
> >>>
> >>
> >> We can not use !is_mmio_spte() here, since the shadow page can be zapped anytime,
> >> for example:
> >>
> >> sp.spt[i] = mmio-spte
> >>
> >>           VCPU 0                                    VCPU 1    
> >> Access sp.spte[i], ept misconfig is occurred
> >>                                                    delete sp
> >>                                    (if the number of shadow page is out of the limit
> >>                                     or page shrink is required, and other events...)
> >>
> >> Walk shadow page out of the lock and get the
> >> non-present spte
> >> (*the point we are discussing*)
> > 
> > Then is_mmio_spte(non-present spte) == false, right? Point is that it
> > only sptes with precise mmio spte pattern should be considered mmio
> > sptes, otherwise consider a genuine EPT misconfiguration error (which
> > must be reported).
> > 
> 
> No, not all no mmio spte is considered a genuine EPT misconfig, as the above
> case, we can get !is_mmio_spte(), but it is not the genuine EPT misconfig
> since it is caused by shadow page zapped

I mean it must be

if (is_mmio_spte(spte))
    handle_mmio
if (spte == spte_not_present) /* race, let CPU refault */
    return
handle EPT misconf

> > What about using fault code instead of spte as Avi suggested instead?
> > 
> 
> Do you mean waking guest page table to get mmio gva/mmio gpa for softmmu instead
> of walking shadow page table?
> 
> I think it is unsafe, since guest can change the mapping anytime, we can get the
> wrong mmio gva/mmio gpa to mmio emulate, consider follow case:
> 
> gva is mapped to the mmio region, we set the reserved bits in the spte:
> 
> VCPU 0                                               VCPU 1
> Access gva, reserved page fault is occurred
>                                              map gva to the RAM region
> Walking guest page table and get the RAM gpa           TLB flush
> (*the point we are discussing*)
> 
> Then we can get the wrong gpa to mmio emulate, so
> - VMM can detected the invalid mmio access
> - the event is missed, it neither accesses the mmio region nor the RAM region,
>   it is not as the real cpu does
> 
> Anyway, mmio spte is needed to detect bugs for hard mmu

Actually i was thinking about EPT misconf, but there are no other fields
than GPA. 


  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-23 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-22 14:27 [PATCH v2 0/22] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/22] KVM: MMU: fix walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 17:13   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-23  2:05     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-27  6:35     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/22] KVM: MMU: do not update slot bitmap if spte is nonpresent Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 03/22] KVM: x86: fix broken read emulation spans a page boundary Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29  8:21   ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 10:53     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:19       ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 04/22] KVM: x86: introduce vcpu_gva_to_gpa to cleanup the code Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29  8:24   ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 10:56     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:09       ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:26         ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:26           ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:48             ` Gleb Natapov
2011-06-22 14:30 ` [PATCH v2 05/22] KVM: x86: abstract the operation for read/write emulation Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29  8:37   ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 10:59     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/22] KVM: x86: cleanup the code of " Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/22] KVM: MMU: cache mmio info on page fault path Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29  8:48   ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:09     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:10       ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/22] KVM: MMU: optimize to handle dirty bit Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/22] KVM: MMU: cleanup for FNAME(fetch) Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:32 ` [PATCH v2 10/22] KVM: MMU: rename 'pt_write' to 'emulate' Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:32 ` [PATCH v2 11/22] KVM: MMU: count used shadow pages on prepareing path Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:32 ` [PATCH v2 12/22] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_free_page Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 13/22] KVM: MMU: remove bypass_guest_pf Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 14/22] KVM: MMU: filter out the mmio pfn from the fault pfn Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 15/22] KVM: MMU: abstract some functions to handle " Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 16/22] KVM: MMU: introduce the rules to modify shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 17/22] KVM: MMU: clean up spte updating and clearing Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: MMU: do not need atomicly to set/clear spte Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH v2 19/22] KVM: MMU: lockless walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29  9:16   ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:16     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:18       ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:50         ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 12:18           ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 12:28             ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 12:27               ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 12:39                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 13:01                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 13:05                     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH v2 20/22] KVM: MMU: reorganize struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 21/22] KVM: MMU: mmio page fault support Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 21:59   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-23  3:19     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-23  6:40       ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-23 14:21       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-23 17:55         ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-23 20:13           ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2011-06-24  2:04             ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-26  8:42           ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-27 11:00   ` [PATCH v3 " Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29  9:22   ` [PATCH v2 " Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 12:28     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 22/22] KVM: MMU: trace mmio page fault Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29  9:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/22] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110623201319.GA19483@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox