From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinned
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:35:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110624150533.GB1519@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=7S2qdVjbJkDja+GAoD=pNo2gPsTFZMFkB8NWWkO1JVQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> [2011-06-21 12:48:17]:
> Hi Kamalesh,
>
> Can you see what things look like under v7?
>
> There's been a few improvements to quota re-distribution that should
> hopefully help your test case.
>
> The remaining idle% I see on my machines appear to be a product of
> load-balancer inefficiency.
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Paul
(snip)
Hi Paul,
Sorry for the delay in the response. I tried the V7 patchset on
top of tip. Patchset passed different combinations build and boot
tests.
I have re-run the tests with couple of combinations on the same
2 socket,4 core, HT box. The test data was collected for 60 seconds
run
un-pinned and cpu shares of 1024
-------------------------------------------------
Top five cgroups and its sub-cgroups were assigned default
cpu shares of 1024.
Average CPU Idle percentage 21.8333%
Bandwidth shared with remaining non-Idle 78.1667%
un-pinned and cpu shares are proportional
--------------------------------------------------
Top five cgroups were assigned cpu shares proportional to
no of sub-cgroups it has under its hierarchy.
For example cgroup1's share is (1024*2) = 2048 and each sub-cgroups
has shares of 1024.
Average CPU Idle percentage 14.2%
Bandwidth shared with remaining non-Idle 85.8%
pinned and cpu shares of 1024
--------------------------------------------------
Average CPU Idle percentage 0.0666667%
Bandwidth shared with remaining non-Idle 99.9333333%
pinned and cpu shares are proportional
--------------------------------------------------
Average CPU Idle percentage 0%
Bandwidth shared with remaining non-Idle 100%
I have captured the perf sched stats for every run. Let me
know if that will help. I can mail them to you privately.
Thanks,
Kamalesh.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-24 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-03 9:28 [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V6 Paul Turner
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 01/15] sched: (fixlet) dont update shares twice on on_rq parent Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:14 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-10 8:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-05-11 7:55 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 8:13 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-11 8:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-05-11 8:59 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 02/15] sched: hierarchical task accounting for SCHED_OTHER Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:17 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 03/15] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFS bandwidth tracking Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:18 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 04/15] sched: validate CFS quota hierarchies Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:20 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:37 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-16 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 12:32 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-17 15:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-18 7:16 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-18 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 05/15] sched: add a timer to handle CFS bandwidth refresh Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:21 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:27 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-16 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 12:56 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 06/15] sched: accumulate per-cfs_rq cpu usage and charge against bandwidth Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:22 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:25 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-16 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 12:59 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-17 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-18 7:02 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-16 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 07/15] sched: expire invalid runtime Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:22 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-16 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 11:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 08/15] sched: throttle cfs_rq entities which exceed their local runtime Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:23 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-16 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 09/15] sched: unthrottle cfs_rq(s) who ran out of quota at period refresh Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:24 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:24 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 10/15] sched: allow for positional tg_tree walks Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:24 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-17 13:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-18 7:18 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 11/15] sched: prevent interactions between throttled entities and load-balance Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:26 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:11 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 12/15] sched: migrate throttled tasks on HOTPLUG Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:27 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:10 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 13/15] sched: add exports tracking cfs bandwidth control statistics Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:27 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 7:56 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:09 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03 9:29 ` [patch 14/15] sched: return unused runtime on voluntary sleep Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:28 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-03 9:29 ` [patch 15/15] sched: add documentation for bandwidth control Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:29 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:09 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-07 15:45 ` CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinned Kamalesh Babulal
2011-06-08 3:09 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-08 10:46 ` Vladimir Davydov
2011-06-08 16:32 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-06-09 3:25 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-10 18:17 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-06-14 0:00 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-15 5:37 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-06-21 19:48 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-24 15:05 ` Kamalesh Babulal [this message]
2011-09-07 11:00 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-07 14:54 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-07 15:20 ` CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinnede Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-07 19:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-08 15:15 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-09 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-09 13:26 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-12 10:17 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-12 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 4:15 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 5:03 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 5:05 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 11:28 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 14:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 16:21 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 16:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 17:41 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 17:54 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 18:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 18:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:28 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 18:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:35 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-15 17:55 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-09-15 21:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 17:51 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-09-20 0:38 ` Venki Pallipadi
2011-09-20 11:09 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-09-20 13:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-21 17:34 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-09-13 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:01 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 18:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-16 8:14 ` Paul Turner
2011-09-16 8:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 16:35 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-16 8:22 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-14 10:16 ` CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinned Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-14 6:58 ` [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V6 Hu Tao
2011-06-14 7:29 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-14 7:44 ` Hu Tao
2011-06-15 8:37 ` Hu Tao
2011-06-16 0:57 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-16 9:45 ` Hu Tao
2011-06-17 1:22 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-17 6:05 ` Hu Tao
2011-06-17 6:25 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-17 9:13 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-18 0:28 ` Paul Turner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110624150533.GB1519@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).