From: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>
To: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
djm@mindrot.org, segoon@openwall.com, mingo@elte.hu,
rostedt@goodmis.org, jmorris@namei.org, fweisbec@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, scarybeasts@gmail.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/13] seccomp_filter: new mode with configurable syscall filters
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:20:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110624202015.GD32221@outflux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308875813-20122-3-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org>
Hi Will,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 07:36:42PM -0500, Will Drewry wrote:
> This change adds a new seccomp mode which specifies the allowed system
> calls dynamically. When in the new mode (2), all system calls are
> checked against process-defined filters - first by system call number,
> then by a filter string. If an entry exists for a given system call and
> all filter predicates evaluate to true, then the task may proceed.
> Otherwise, the task is killed.
> [...]
> Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Thanks for continuing to work on this. I look forward to being able to use
it. :)
Acked-by: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>
--
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-24 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-24 0:36 [PATCH v9 01/13] tracing: split out filter initialization and clean up uses Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 02/13] tracing: split out syscall_trace_enter construction Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 03/13] seccomp_filter: new mode with configurable syscall filters Will Drewry
2011-06-24 7:30 ` Damien Miller
2011-06-24 20:20 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 04/13] seccomp_filter: add process state reporting Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 05/13] seccomp_filter: Document what seccomp_filter is and how it works Will Drewry
2011-06-24 7:24 ` Chris Evans
[not found] ` <BANLkTimtYUyXbZjWhjK61B_1WBXE4MoAeA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-26 23:20 ` James Morris
2011-06-29 19:13 ` Will Drewry
2011-06-30 1:30 ` James Morris
2011-07-01 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 12:56 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-01 13:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 15:46 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-01 16:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 16:43 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-01 18:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-01 18:09 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-01 18:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-04 2:19 ` James Morris
2011-07-05 12:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-05 23:46 ` James Morris
2011-07-06 0:37 ` [Ksummit-2011-discuss] " Ted Ts'o
2011-07-05 23:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-05 2:54 ` [Ksummit-2011-discuss] " Eugene Teo
2011-07-01 20:25 ` Kees Cook
2011-07-04 16:09 ` [Ksummit-2011-discuss] " Greg KH
2011-07-01 21:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 21:34 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-05 9:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-06 18:24 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-05 15:26 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 06/13] x86: add HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and seccomp_execve Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 07/13] arm: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 08/13] microblaze: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and provide seccomp_execve Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 09/13] mips: " Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 10/13] s390: " Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 11/13] powerpc: " Will Drewry
2011-08-30 5:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-11-28 0:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-11-28 1:45 ` Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 12/13] sparc: " Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 13/13] sh: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER Will Drewry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110624202015.GD32221@outflux.net \
--to=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=djm@mindrot.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=scarybeasts@gmail.com \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox