From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758753Ab1F0NiM (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:38:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22501 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759986Ab1F0NgP (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:36:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:34:20 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp Cc: roland@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: arch_ptrace_attach() without ptrace_traceme()? Message-ID: <20110627133420.GA3527@redhat.com> References: <201106270720.p5R7Kd9E095193@www262.sakura.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201106270720.p5R7Kd9E095193@www262.sakura.ne.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (add lkml) On 06/27, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp wrote: > > Regarding commit f1671f6d "ptrace: fix exit_ptrace() vs ptrace_traceme() race", > is calling arch_ptrace_attach() when ptrace_traceme() returned 0 without doing > anything (due to PF_EXITING race) expected behavior? Hmm. Good point, I thinks this should be fixed. Thanks! Oleg.