From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Olaf Freyer <aaron667@gmx.net>
Cc: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:18:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110628141831.55502d76@jbarnes-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E0A4319.6040309@gmx.net>
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:09:45 +0200
Olaf Freyer <aaron667@gmx.net> wrote:
> >>> I'd guess ccab5c82759e2ace74b2e84f82d1e0eedd932571 could be the
> >>> cause. Can you check if the appended revert of that commit makes
> >>> things disappear?
> >> It seems like you guessed perfectly correct - reverting the commit makes
> >> those notifications go away at once.
> >>
> > Without this reverted you see messages? I missed the earlier stuff,
> > what message are you seeing?
> >
> Since 2.6.39 I saw those as soon as I start up the xserver:
>
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.525844] CPU4: Package power
> limit notification (total events = 1)
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.525848] CPU0: Package power
> limit notification (total events = 1)
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.525851] CPU1: Package power
> limit notification (total events = 1)
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.525854] CPU2: Package power
> limit notification (total events = 1)
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.525856] CPU5: Package power
> limit notification (total events = 1)
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.525859] CPU3: Package power
> limit notification (total events = 1)
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.525861] Disabling lock
> debugging due to kernel taint
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.525869] CPU6: Package power
> limit notification (total events = 1)
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.525872] CPU7: Package power
> limit notification (total events = 1)
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.536890] CPU1: Package power
> limit normal
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.536893] CPU4: Package power
> limit normal
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.536896] CPU2: Package power
> limit normal
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.536899] CPU3: Package power
> limit normal
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.536901] CPU5: Package power
> limit normal
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.536904] CPU0: Package power
> limit normal
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.536915] CPU6: Package power
> limit normal
> May 22 14:41:34 localhost kernel: [ 57.536918] CPU7: Package power
> limit normal
Ok interesting, didn't realize X startup was so GPU intensive. :)
The patch you reverted will definitely cause the GPU to ramp up its
frequency much faster than before, but it sounds like on your system
you might also see it with the revert if you run something GPU
intensive like nexuiz.
The CPU (and by extension the GPU) will take care of itself though; if
things get too hot or over power, it will clock throttle to keep itself
in a safe range.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-28 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-22 13:01 Erroneous package power limit notification since kernel 2.6.39 Olaf Freyer
2011-05-25 15:40 ` Olaf Freyer
2011-06-02 16:50 ` Olaf Freyer
2011-06-26 16:27 ` Florian Mickler
2011-06-28 20:46 ` Olaf Freyer
2011-06-28 20:59 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-06-28 21:09 ` Olaf Freyer
2011-06-28 21:18 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2011-06-28 22:01 ` Olaf Freyer
2011-06-28 22:06 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-06-30 6:37 ` Olaf Freyer
2011-07-22 16:10 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-05-29 19:53 ` Maciej Rutecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110628141831.55502d76@jbarnes-desktop \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=aaron667@gmx.net \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=florian@mickler.org \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox