From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755019Ab1F2OSV (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:18:21 -0400 Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:45115 "EHLO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751363Ab1F2OSS (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:18:18 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: glLHRIz1C2gfFWHagNpXmIjAHpbhr3f1liXjjnt832hQ 1309357097 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:18:06 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 29 Message-ID: <20110629141806.GB16986@kroah.com> References: <20110629162454.e2326fcf.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110629162454.e2326fcf.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 04:24:54PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20110628: > > My fixes tree is empty again (the early part of mmotm-2011-06-22-13-05 is > mostly now included in Linus' tree and the experiment failed anyway :-)) Did it fail? I thought it at least solved the build errors that people were seeing in the staging tree in other arches, allowing them to move on to other, "real" issues that they had. Thanks for doing it, I appreciated it at the least. greg k-h