From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757060Ab1GAWEZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2011 18:04:25 -0400 Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:48270 "EHLO out3.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755520Ab1GAWEY (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2011 18:04:24 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 0kXVwtno9VtSAEnTcZfJawbF87BqJrTEFHE7QK/PBNqY 1309557864 Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 14:57:40 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Jim Cromie , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gnb@fmeh.org, jbaron@redhat.com, gregkh@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] dynamic_debug: allow changing of dynamic_debug verbosity any time Message-ID: <20110701215740.GA13572@kroah.com> References: <1309244992-2305-1-git-send-email-jim.cromie@gmail.com> <1309244992-2305-2-git-send-email-jim.cromie@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:41:18PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Jim Cromie wrote: > > allow changing dynamic_debug verbosity > > at boot-time, with: dynamic_debug.verbose=1 > > or at runtime with: > > root@voyage:~# echo 1 > /sys/module/dynamic_debug/parameters/verbose > > > > Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie > > --- > >  lib/dynamic_debug.c |    1 + > >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/dynamic_debug.c b/lib/dynamic_debug.c > > index 75ca78f..a3b08d5 100644 > > --- a/lib/dynamic_debug.c > > +++ b/lib/dynamic_debug.c > > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct ddebug_iter { > >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(ddebug_lock); > >  static LIST_HEAD(ddebug_tables); > >  static int verbose = 0; > > +module_param(verbose, int, 0744); > > Why 0744 and not 0644 ? Why to set the 'executable' bit ? Yeah, that's wrong, Jim, care to fix this?