public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com,
	mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp, horms@verge.net.au,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 2/9] kdump: Add machine_kexec_finish()
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 19:09:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110704170958.874632821@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110704170922.976299676@linux.vnet.ibm.com

[-- Attachment #1: 02-s390-kdump-common-kexec_finish.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1571 bytes --]

From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On s390 we create checksums for the loaded kexec segments case of kdump.
Therefore we need an additional callback at the end of the kexec_load()
system call. This patch introduces machine_kexec_finish() with an empty
implementation for all architectures that do not need the callback.

Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/kexec.h |    1 +
 kernel/kexec.c        |    8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

--- a/include/linux/kexec.h
+++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ struct kimage {
 /* kexec interface functions */
 extern void machine_kexec(struct kimage *image);
 extern int machine_kexec_prepare(struct kimage *image);
+extern void machine_kexec_finish(struct kimage *image, int flags);
 extern void machine_kexec_cleanup(struct kimage *image);
 extern asmlinkage long sys_kexec_load(unsigned long entry,
 					unsigned long nr_segments,
--- a/kernel/kexec.c
+++ b/kernel/kexec.c
@@ -1017,6 +1017,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(kexec_load, unsigned lon
 		kimage_terminate(image);
 	}
 	/* Install the new kernel, and  Uninstall the old */
+	machine_kexec_finish(image, flags);
 	image = xchg(dest_image, image);
 
 out:
@@ -1026,6 +1027,13 @@ out:
 	return result;
 }
 
+/*
+ * provide an empty default implementation here -- architecture
+ * code may override this
+ */
+void __weak machine_kexec_finish(struct kimage *image, int flags)
+{}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
 asmlinkage long compat_sys_kexec_load(unsigned long entry,
 				unsigned long nr_segments,


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-04 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-04 17:09 [patch 0/9] kdump: Patch series for s390 support Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 1/9] kdump: Add KEXEC_CRASH_CONTROL_MEMORY_LIMIT Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` Michael Holzheu [this message]
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 3/9] kdump: Make kimage_load_crash_segment() weak Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 4/9] kdump: Initialize vmcoreinfo note at startup Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 5/9] kdump: Allow vmcore ELF header to be created in new kernel Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 6/9] kdump: Merge set_vmcore_list_offsets_elf_32/64() Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 7/9] kdump: Trigger kdump via panic notifier chain on s390 Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 8/9] s390: kdump backend code Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 9/9] kexec-tools: Add s390 kdump support Michael Holzheu
2011-07-05 20:26 ` [patch 0/9] kdump: Patch series for s390 support Vivek Goyal
2011-07-06  9:24   ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-07 19:33     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-08  9:01       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-11 14:42         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-11 15:56           ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-13 16:02             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-13 16:46               ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-13 16:59                 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-13 17:19                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-13 20:00                 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-14  7:18                   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-14 17:55                     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-14 18:05                       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-15 14:21                         ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-15 14:38                           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-15 15:43                             ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-18 12:31                               ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-18 14:00                                 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-18 14:19                                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-18 14:44                                     ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-18 15:25                                       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-18 18:03                                         ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-19 15:04                                           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-20  8:00                                             ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-20  9:28                                             ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-20 20:24                                               ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-20 19:25                                           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-21 14:58                                             ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-21 21:22                                               ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-22  9:33                                                 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-25 16:02                                                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-26  9:44                                                     ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-22 15:26                                         ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-25 18:07                                           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-26  9:32                                             ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-15 13:56                       ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-15 14:18                         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-18 13:57                       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-08 13:04       ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-11 15:36         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-12 17:29           ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-08 14:02       ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-11 14:07         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-11 15:06           ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-09 17:58       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-07-12 13:52         ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110704170958.874632821@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox