From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756370Ab1GDPNg (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2011 11:13:36 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:60163 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751996Ab1GDPNf (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2011 11:13:35 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: [PATCH for 3.0] AT91: Change nand buswidth logic to match hardware default configuration Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 17:13:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.37; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patrice.vilchez@atmel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1309515924-22531-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> <201107041625.25972.arnd@arndb.de> <4E11D123.9070409@atmel.com> In-Reply-To: <4E11D123.9070409@atmel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107041713.23982.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:e8no0qWvTj/t52M/+odYxJbYUAj0BUzzGoaxhuzy4W3 dm1gSrlJWiEYecGbKqdHgyL2Qq8kXNWCGGnD+ZcpmT7HITv8lQ 6SfvxPZtYN1M4o4rT6FNcaXxbGqxvBrfaJ4iiMTHqy2BEJpKj4 pCPgcnXbVO8C3duejzkxPi9cm9HAA1bkMdBn+nKibPnf/gfvq5 mEK1d65e/c6Tzyi+yb60Q== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 04 July 2011, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > In this case, studying the patch more closely shows that it's > > very harmless, but I'd rather not have to look that closely. > > Well, in fact it is a fix against what was introduced in a 3.0 patch > which I found to be wrong. > The reason because I do not want to be in next kernel is the fact that > it can puzzle the user (people that want to use kernel without changing > the system_rev between 2.6.39 -> 3.0 and again revert their changes for > 3.0 -> 3.1). > > > Am I correct that the bug is a regression against 2.6.39? > > No, in fact it was introduced during 3.0 early -rc. That's what I mean by 'regression against 2.6.39': it was working in 2.6.39, but later kernels are broken without this fix. Arnd