From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 17:21:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201107051721.02079.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110705142149.GA3498@suse.de>
On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Greg KH wrote:
> So the driver core is just going to sit and spin and continue to try to
> probe drivers for as long as it gets that error value returned? What is
> going to ever cause that loop to terminate? It seems a bit hacky to
> just keep looping over and over and hoping that sometime everything will
> all settle down so that we can go to sleep again.
Well, it only needs to try as long as there are still new devices
succeeding to get probed. The order that I think this should happen
in is:
* go through all initcalls, record any devices that are not yet ready
* retry all devices on the list as long as at least one of them has
succeeded.
* when a new device gets matched from a module load, do that loop again
If I read the patch correctly, the workqueue would be scheduled
every time a new device gets added, which retries the devices
more often than necessary and can have significant boot time
impact, and it also introduces more asynchronicity that may expose
new bugs.
Maybe we can have a late_initcall that enables the automatic retry
and probes everything once:
static bool deferred_probe;
static int __init deferred_probe_start(void)
{
deferred_probe = true;
mutex_lock(&deferred_probe_mutex);
if (!list_empty(&deferred_probe_list))
schedule_work(&deferred_probe_work);
mutex_unlock(&deferred_probe_mutex);
flush_work_sync(&deferred_probe_work);
}
late_initcall(retry_devices);
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-05 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-04 17:11 [PATCH] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism Grant Likely
2011-07-04 17:41 ` Greg KH
2011-07-04 17:56 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-04 18:01 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-05 14:21 ` Greg KH
2011-07-05 15:21 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-07-05 15:50 ` Greg KH
2011-07-05 16:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-05 16:27 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-05 16:11 ` Kay Sievers
2011-07-05 16:28 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-05 16:36 ` Greg KH
2011-07-05 17:17 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-05 17:29 ` Greg KH
2011-07-05 17:35 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-10 14:24 ` Kay Sievers
2011-07-05 16:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-05 16:05 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-04 19:56 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-07-04 20:47 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-04 23:25 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-05 6:11 ` Mark Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-05 15:47 Grant Likely
2012-03-05 17:38 ` Alan Cox
2012-03-05 17:40 ` David Daney
2012-03-05 17:50 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-05 19:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-05 21:10 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-05 21:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-03-05 21:28 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-06 9:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-05 21:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-03-05 22:09 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-05 22:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-03-06 0:08 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-06 5:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-03-06 7:52 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-08 20:22 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201107051721.02079.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox