From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Please submit platform trees for inclusion in arm-soc.git v3.1
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:12:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201107061312.01852.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B85A65D85D7EB246BE421B3FB0FBB593024D91AB83@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 23:48:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > * If you currently merge your patches upstream through RMK's tree,
> > you can keep doing so.
>
> We currently send DaVinci patches upstream through Russell.
> This makes it look like the change applies only to those
> maintainers who were sending patches to Linus directly.
>
> I want to make sure I read this correctly and should continue
> sending patches upstream through Russell?
You are welcome to submit patches to the arm-soc tree instead of
Russell's if you prefer to do so, either way is fine with me
at least.
The arm-soc tree was introduced mostly to reorganize the upstream
merge process for those platforms that directly send patches to
Linus, but we can also do it for everyone else.
We probably still need to try out a few things and see how it goes.
Russell also has write access to the arm-soc tree, so one of the
possible models is that you send the patches to him, but he adds
them to the arm-soc tree rather than the arm-linux one.
Russell, do you have a preference? If you want to stop merging
subarch trees into linux-arm.git, we can do that in arm-soc.git.
The idea behind my suggestion to keep using your tree was to not
change too many things at once, and we can always revisit this
question.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-06 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-01 18:18 Please submit platform trees for inclusion in arm-soc.git v3.1 Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-06 9:30 ` Nori, Sekhar
2011-07-06 11:12 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-07-06 10:06 ` Barry Song
2011-07-08 16:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-11 21:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-11 22:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-07-12 12:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201107061312.01852.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox