public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] perf: Attaching an event to a specific PMU
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 19:10:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110706171015.GA13869@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110706165357.GG4590@erda.amd.com>


* Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com> wrote:

> On 05.07.11 05:12:52, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > 
> > > > Overall, my approach improves the perf design. It adds a better 
> > > > and more intuitve access to perf from user space with clear and 
> > > > common methods and interfaces. Please let me know the concerns 
> > > > you have.
> > > 
> > > Its redundant, this interface ship has sailed, its not going to 
> > > happen.
> > 
> > Even if we had the choice, i don't see how a /dev based enumeration 
> > of PMUs is in any way better than a topologically attached set of 
> > PMUs in /sys.
> > 
> > This kind of structure is nice in principle:
> > 
> >  # ls -l /dev/pmu/
> >  total 0
> >  crw-rw---- 1 root root 254, 5 Jul  8  2011 breakpoint
> >  crw-rw---- 1 root root 254, 4 Jul  8  2011 cpu
> >  crw-rw---- 1 root root 254, 6 Jul  8  2011 proto
> >  crw-rw---- 1 root root 254, 1 Jul  8  2011 software
> >  crw-rw---- 1 root root 254, 2 Jul  8  2011 tracepoint
> > 
> > But it should be done in /sys/.
> 
> I have to learn yet why /dev is bad and /sys is good...

Because /sys is already there and already carries rather rich 
classification of various hardware components, devices and kernel 
subsystems.

/dev/ is mostly a flat registry of classical, unstructured devices.

> The system topology is always in /sys, also for device nodes. But 
> we can't get a device file descriptor from /sys. I doubt /sys is 
> capable to handle a device use count (need to be checked). We 
> actually must grab the pmu while attaching events to it. And, user 
> space implementation is must easier with /dev (see code in my 
> previous mail).

I think Peter suggested it that an open() done in /sys should give us 
a handle to a given event?

> My patch also includes code that creates a device class. It is also 
> visible in /sys/class/pmu/*.

But PMU is a very limited term: what we want is a higher level 
organization of 'event sources' and 'events'. Some may come from 
PMUs, many wont.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-06 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-03 15:04 [RFC] [PATCH] perf: Attaching an event to a specific PMU Robert Richter
2011-07-03 18:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-04 17:59   ` Robert Richter
2011-07-05  8:51     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-05  9:12       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-06 16:53         ` Robert Richter
2011-07-06 17:10           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-07-06 17:14             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-06 17:15               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-07 10:22             ` Robert Richter
2011-07-06 17:12           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-07  9:21             ` Robert Richter
2011-07-07  9:39               ` Robert Richter
2011-07-07 19:38               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-05  9:47     ` [PATCH] perf: Extend attr check to allow also dynamically generated Robert Richter
2011-07-05 10:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-05 10:56         ` Robert Richter
2011-07-05 10:53     ` [PATCH] perf: Extend attr check to allow also dynamically generated types Robert Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110706171015.GA13869@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox