From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756500Ab1GFV1t (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 17:27:49 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:63050 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756284Ab1GFV1r (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 17:27:47 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: l2x0: Add OF based initialization Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 23:26:53 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.0.0-rc1nosema+; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, workgroup.linux@csr.com, Olof Johansson , tglx@linutronix.de, weizeng.he@csr.com, "Russell King - ARM Linux" References: <1309984979-8847-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <1309984979-8847-2-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <20110706210237.GB5371@ponder.secretlab.ca> In-Reply-To: <20110706210237.GB5371@ponder.secretlab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107062326.53737.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:b2f8HjR8wRE7KcXY8KeXl+B3oZtOCd0Yr+G2u8W9fN1 PCtJP3SkyZlovcHq5pOeB/2aF7FslhtTXJktjNrgLsN0SoxstF qxebxMuEAsXd4F0cTYQHVWW/4rpqxoMKQnonscBA7GiHGnCWoY FqWQZRVvj6BTn3FE44ejl/8I+rW95BUXeLR03UkXsLgKtAJsSW P93pBCrOTaZBuD516Dhkw== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 06 July 2011 23:02:37 Grant Likely wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:42:59PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > From: Rob Herring > > > > This adds probing for ARM L2x0 cache controllers via device tree. Support > > includes the L210, L220, and PL310 controllers. The binding allows setting > > up cache RAM latencies and filter addresses (PL310 only). > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring > > Acked-by: Grant Likely > > By rights, this should go via the arm tree, but it depends on patches > that are already in devicetree/next. Arnd, how do you want to handle > this? I want to avoid rebasing devicetree/next. It's outside of the scope of the arm-soc tree really, the l2x0 code is clearly core arm stuff, so it belongs into Russell's tree. I think it's best if Russell can provide an Ack for this and you put it in the tree that already has the dependencies. Arnd