From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:53:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110707105315.GA3412@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309996623-23108-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>
> I got a request to make it easier to determine the microcode update level
> on Intel CPUs. This patch adds a new "microcode" field to /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> The microcode level is also outputed on fatal machine checks together
> with the other CPUID model information.
>
> I removed the respective code from the microcode update driver, it
> just reads the field from cpu_data. Also when the microcode is updated
> it fills in the new values too.
>
> I had to add a memory barrier to native_cpuid to prevent it being
> optimized away when the result is not used.
>
> This turns out to clean up further code which already got this
> information manually. This is done in followon patches.
>
> v2: Lots of updates based on feedback.
> v3: Rename cpu_update to microcode. Misc changes from feedback.
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 4 +++-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 9 +++++++--
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 14 +++++---------
> 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
You have *still* ignored some of the review suggestions i gave you in
the previous thread, and you know that i won't apply your patches
without you addressing all feedback.
So why did you send this incomplete series?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-07 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-06 23:57 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
2011-07-06 23:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-07-11 8:19 ` Jean Delvare
2011-07-06 23:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-07-11 11:46 ` Jean Delvare
2011-07-07 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-01 19:21 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110707105315.GA3412@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox