From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 16:09:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110707200949.GA25216@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110707194851.GB4394@Xye>
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 01:18:51AM +0530, Raghavendra D Prabhu wrote:
> * On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:24:54PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> >>Tested it. Works now.
> >
> >Ok, Stuck Tested-by on the patch. Hopefully Linus hasn't pulled it yet.
> Ok.
> >
> >>Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
>
> >>Also,
> >>The condition for acpi_gsi_to_irq can be removed since it always returns zero.
> >
> >The function might in the future return something that is non-zero
> >and we should guard for it. Also you make 'irq' be unsigned which is not
> >good as the IRQ 0 is a valid value - and with making it unsigned if it is
> >set to -1 (the -1 is the invalid IRQ value) the check for 'irq != gsi'
> >will be true and and we will pass in -1 casted to unsigned. That is a
> >large value and not the right thing we want to pass to xen_register_gsi.
>
> My rationale for the unsigned part was that acpi_gsi_to_irq always
> assigns a positive value (>= 0) to the irq passed (as unsigned
> argument). But even otherwise that shouldn't make much of difference I guess.
>
> Also,
> I had sent another change (oneline) for the file
> arch/x86/xen/platform-pci-unplug.c for check_platform_magic, looks like that has not gone into
> the pull request for Linus.
Oh, I didn't see it. Did you CC me on it? Can you bounce it to me please?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-07 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-03 23:25 [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-04 8:49 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-04 22:16 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-05 14:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 14:27 ` [TOME] " Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-05 14:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-05 21:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-06 8:30 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-07-07 15:46 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 16:24 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-07 19:48 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-07 20:09 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-07-07 21:04 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-08 20:26 ` [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix (for platform-pci-unplug.c) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-09 16:29 ` [TOME] " Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-07-11 10:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110707200949.GA25216@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rprabhu@wnohang.net \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox