From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754119Ab1GHUrE (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:47:04 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:46788 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753657Ab1GHUrB (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:47:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:46:32 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Michal Hocko , LKML Subject: Re: [Cleanup PATCH] rcu: Do not use rcu_read_lock_held when calling rcu_dereference_check Message-ID: <20110708204632.GZ6014@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20110708135739.GB12834@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20110708154829.GS6014@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110708155752.GE12834@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20110708163033.GG12834@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20110708185148.GV6014@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:22:45PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > Hmm, thinking about it some more. Wouldn't it make more sense to push > > > this through trivial tree (CCing Jikos)? Having 5 or so patches with the > > > exactly same changelog sounds overkill to me. > > > > > > What do you think? Could you give me your Acked-by if you are OK with > > > it, please? > > > > Whatever works. ;-) > > > > However, I did queue the Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt patch already. > > That's no problem for git. But anyway, I have dropped that part. > > > For the others, > > > > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney > > Thanks. Applied. Thank you, Jiri! Thanx, Paul