From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753358Ab1GLNaU (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:30:20 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:65123 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753096Ab1GLNaS (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:30:18 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: "Uwe =?iso-8859-15?q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=" Subject: Re: [PATCH] new helper to define common struct resource constructs Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:29:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-22-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Sascha Hauer , Wolfram Sang , thierry.nolf.barco@gmail.com, Huang Shijie , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Lothar =?iso-8859-15?q?Wa=DFmann?= , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <14C4E31473AF7E4B98176CB73615181C19FBD3@039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net> <201107072304.05626.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <201107121529.17611.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:6ythQqasGZhpJY7Yt2xFOcnTXPpP06xJ2CzZSs6cGZi idTsG2e1oTjgmwyJl6jF4GBLH4dV8mplgQn3XmINYZwY4Kh9qi 9OOrdYxbkmXMJ4pMJusf7P8aqHsLuFYZLrSb12HrO0WzvdRJVL y8Cl24JeorC1o8ewnGlMaAMNmgjx6qg4SX8xgU5ktjNqgF/9Ew SwL4w8CCJiE6u7xvVLkew== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 11 July 2011, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > resource definitions that just define start, end and flags = IORESOURCE_MEM > or IORESOURCE_IRQ (with start=end) are quite common. So introduce a shortcut > for them. Also make available a macro to specify named resources of both > types which are less common. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann What do others think, is this worthwhile? Should we also define macros for IORESOURCE_IO and IORESOURCE_DMA? Arnd