public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	julie Sullivan <kernelmail.jms@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chengxu@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 3.0-rc kernels unbootable since -rc3
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:59:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110712185907.GJ2326@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110712180151.GA18257@dumpdata.com>

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 02:01:51PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > http://darnok.org/xen/loop_cnt.log
> > > 
> > > which seems to imply that we are indeed stuck in that loop
> > > forever.
> > 
> > It does indeed, thank you!  Also it looks like interrupts are
> > disabled, and that timekeeping is similarly out of action.
> 
> .. With the latest patch the time looks to be advancing.

Sounds like an improvement.  ;-)

> > Disabling CONFIG_NO_HZ would be an interesting test case.
> 
> Hadn't done that yet. Compiling a kernel with "# CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set"
> right now.
> > 
> > > > o	Problems due to portions of the code attempting to use
> > > > 	RCU read-side critical sections while in dyntick-idle mode.
> > > > 	Frederic Weisbecker has located some of these, (though not yet
> > > > 	in Xen) and he has some diagnositics which may be found at:
> > > > 
> > > > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-2.6-rcu.git
> > > > 
> > > > 	on branch eqscheck.2011.07.08a.
> > > > 
> > > > 	You need to enable CONFIG_PROVE_RCU for these diagnostics to
> > > > 	be executed.
> > > 
> > > Ok, let me try those too.
> > 
> > Thank you!
> 
> Will shortly do this.
> > 
> > > > o	As always, there might be bugs in RCU.  ;-)
> > > > 
> > > > But the loop in task_waking_fair() looks like the most prominent smoking
> > > > gun at the moment.
> > 
> > And could you also please try out the patch that I posted earlier?
> 
> With the previous patch and the .. this is getting confusing. With this patch:
> http://darnok.org/xen/loop_cnt-extra.patch

That is indeed the patch I intended.

> I get this output: http://darnok.org/xen/log.loop_cnt-extra-patch (one guest
> with 4 VCPUS) and http://darnok.org/xen/loop_cnt-extra-patch.log (the guest with 16 VCPUs)

OK, so the infinite loop in task_waking_fair() happens even if RCU callbacks
are deferred until after the scheduler is fully initialized.  Sounds like
one for the scheduler guys.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-12 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-06 21:10 PROBLEM: 3.0-rc kernels unbootable since -rc3 julie Sullivan
2011-07-06 21:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-07 19:31   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-07 19:47   ` julie Sullivan
2011-07-07 19:58     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-07 20:28       ` julie Sullivan
2011-07-07 20:47       ` julie Sullivan
2011-07-08  0:29         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-09 10:09           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-10  0:45             ` julie Sullivan
2011-07-10  3:25               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-10 16:38                 ` julie Sullivan
2011-07-10 17:16                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-10 17:35                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-10 20:30                       ` julie Sullivan
2011-07-10 21:46                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-10 21:50                           ` julie Sullivan
2011-07-10 23:14                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-11 16:24                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-11 17:13                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-11 19:30                                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-11 20:15                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-11 21:09                                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 10:55                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 14:12                                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 14:49                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 15:07                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 15:15                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 15:22                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 16:32                                                   ` PROBLEM: 3.0-rc kernels unbootable since -rc3 - under Xen, 32-bit guest only Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 16:46                                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 16:03                                               ` PROBLEM: 3.0-rc kernels unbootable since -rc3 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 16:39                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 18:01                                                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 18:59                                                     ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-07-12 19:07                                                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 20:52                                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 19:10                                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-12 19:57                                                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-12 20:46                                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 21:04                                                             ` Julie Sullivan
2011-07-12 21:07                                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 20:05                                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12  6:33                                     ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
2011-07-12 14:05                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
     [not found]                               ` <CAAVPGOMSprJSkzziH6hJv9PweOONzsMaRZEK2ZSrV3xFBReTPw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                                 ` <20110711214301.GP2245@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2011-07-12 21:15                                   ` Julie Sullivan
2011-07-12 21:29                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-12 21:35                                       ` Julie Sullivan
2011-07-12 21:49                                       ` Julie Sullivan
2011-07-12 22:00                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-13  7:18                                           ` RKK
2011-07-13 15:47                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-13 20:57                                           ` Julie Sullivan
2011-07-13 21:23                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-07 17:28 ` julie Sullivan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110712185907.GJ2326@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=chengxu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=kernelmail.jms@gmail.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox