From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: update machine_to_phys_order on resume
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:20:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110713132037.GC7618@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310548364.634.355.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:12:44AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 19:11 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 06:43:42PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > >
> > > Migration of pv guests fails, the guest crashes on the target host once the
> > > guest is unpaused after transit. It happens when the guest is started on a
> > > small systen, then migrated from that small system to a large system.
> > > If the guest is started on a large system, then migrated to a small system and
> > > back to the large system, the migration will be successful.
> > >
> > > The issue is that mfn_to_pfn() makes use of machine_to_phys_order, which
> > > is only configured once early in the boot process. After migration to a
> > > large host the mfns will exceed the order from the small system and a
> > > wrong code path is taken.
> > >
> > > Calling xen_setup_machphys_mapping() again in the resume path will avoid
> > > the crash.
> >
> > Oh, duh!
> >
> > Let me queue that up for 3.0-rc7 unless there are objections?
>
> It's not so much an objection to this patch but this issue seems to have
> been caused by Xen cset 20892:d311d1efc25e which looks to me like a
> subtle ABI breakage for guests. Perhaps we should introduce a feature
> flag to indicate that a guest can cope with the m2p changing size over
> migration like this?
Sounds reasonable to me.. I will wait (I can always submit it during 3.1 cycle
and CC stable@kernel.org to backport it to 3.0.1).
Jan, you are the one who came up with the c/s - what's your thought?
How does your kernel handle the changing size of the M2P - like the patch below?
>
> Ian.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
> > >
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 2 +-
> > > arch/x86/xen/suspend.c | 2 ++
> > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > Index: linux-3.0-rc7/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-3.0-rc7.orig/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> > > +++ linux-3.0-rc7/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> > > @@ -1623,7 +1623,7 @@ static void __init xen_map_identity_earl
> > > set_page_prot(pmd, PAGE_KERNEL_RO);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -void __init xen_setup_machphys_mapping(void)
> > > +void xen_setup_machphys_mapping(void)
> > > {
> > > struct xen_machphys_mapping mapping;
> > > unsigned long machine_to_phys_nr_ents;
> > > Index: linux-3.0-rc7/arch/x86/xen/suspend.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-3.0-rc7.orig/arch/x86/xen/suspend.c
> > > +++ linux-3.0-rc7/arch/x86/xen/suspend.c
> > > @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ void xen_arch_hvm_post_suspend(int suspe
> > >
> > > void xen_arch_post_suspend(int suspend_cancelled)
> > > {
> > > + xen_setup_machphys_mapping();
> > > +
> > > xen_build_mfn_list_list();
> > >
> > > xen_setup_shared_info();
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-13 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110701104148.GA32729@aepfle.de>
[not found] ` <20110712164342.GA12867@aepfle.de>
2011-07-12 18:11 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: update machine_to_phys_order on resume Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-13 9:12 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-13 13:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-07-15 8:56 ` Jan Beulich
2011-07-15 16:05 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] <4E1DB9C70200007800072DCC@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
2011-07-14 10:26 ` Olaf Hering
2011-07-15 8:32 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] <4E20873F020000780007307B@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
2011-07-15 18:23 ` Keir Fraser
2011-07-18 7:05 ` Jan Beulich
2011-07-18 7:27 ` Keir Fraser
2011-07-18 8:31 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-18 8:47 ` Jan Beulich
2011-07-18 9:05 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-18 9:50 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110713132037.GC7618@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox