From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752704Ab1GMWdz (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:33:55 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:55808 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752367Ab1GMWdz (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:33:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:33:48 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linux-MM , LKML , David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm, sparc64: Implement gup_fast() Message-Id: <20110713153348.b68b4196.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1310474531.14978.29.camel@twins> References: <20110712122608.938583937@chello.nl> <1310474531.14978.29.camel@twins> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:42:11 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 14:26 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > With the recent mmu_gather changes that included generic RCU freeing of > > page-tables, it is now quite straight forward to implement gup_fast() on > > sparc64. > > > > Andrew, please consider merging these patches. > > Gah, quilt-mail ate all the From: headers again.. all 4 patches are in > fact written by davem. Do you want a resend? I have an editor ;) I expect these would get more (ie: non-zero) testing if they were merged via Dave's tree?