public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Allow disabling of CONFIG_DEVPORT
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:41:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110715064147.GA1021@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGTjWtB53vW5B2EJ5=+C3buDAY0RtsfANxx5NhC5aWnmEx08EQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:17:24PM -0700, Mike Waychison wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:34:52PM -0700, Mike Waychison wrote:
> >> It would be useful to build kernels with disabled support of /dev/port
> >> for systems where we do not want to allow an administrator to access IO
> >> ports directly.
> >>
> >> To do so however, CONFIG_DEVPORT needs to be user-selectable.  Give this
> >> configuration option a name and help description.
> >>
> >> Google-Bug-Id: 3177114
> >
> > What is that field?  It's not something that I've ever seen before...
> 
> This is for our internal reference.

Internal reference to where?

> > Please don't push internal fields like this to public patches, it only
> > causes confusion...
> 
> It hasn't caused any problems so far.  It helps us track things as we
> pull code back downstream.

Ok, but what happens if all 2000+ different companies start adding their
fields to the signed-off-by: area of the kernel for their internal
tracking systems?

So please, don't do this, it makes no sense to the kernel community at
all and we really don't want to start adding more fields to this area if
we don't have to.

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-15  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-14 20:34 [PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Allow disabling of CONFIG_DEVPORT Mike Waychison
2011-07-14 20:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Allow disabling of sys_iopl, sys_ioperm Mike Waychison
2011-07-14 20:37   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:38     ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-14 20:40       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-18 14:35         ` Jiri Kosina
2011-07-14 22:31   ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-14 22:35     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 22:40       ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-14 22:45         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 23:03           ` Alan Cox
2011-07-14 23:04         ` Alan Cox
2011-07-20 19:42         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-14 22:42   ` Alan Cox
2011-07-14 22:48     ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-14 23:00       ` Alan Cox
2011-07-14 23:20         ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-14 23:39           ` Alan Cox
2011-07-15  0:48             ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-15  9:55               ` Alan Cox
2011-07-15 18:13               ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-15 18:14                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-15 22:30                   ` Andrew G. Morgan
2011-07-15 22:42                     ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-17 23:19                       ` Eric Paris
2011-07-18  0:04                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 21:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Allow disabling of CONFIG_DEVPORT Greg KH
2011-07-14 22:17   ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-15  6:41     ` Greg KH [this message]
2011-07-15 13:13       ` Theodore Tso
2011-07-15 14:51         ` Greg KH
2011-07-15 14:58           ` Alan Cox
2011-07-15 15:19             ` Greg KH
2011-07-15 16:45               ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-15 17:01                 ` Greg KH
2011-07-15 17:51                   ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-15 18:10                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-15 18:50             ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-15 18:55           ` Ted Ts'o
2011-07-16  7:56             ` Greg KH
2011-07-16 13:05               ` Ted Ts'o
2011-07-16 16:38                 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110715064147.GA1021@suse.de \
    --to=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox