From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753413Ab1GPCkZ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:40:25 -0400
Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:45471
	"EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751420Ab1GPCkX (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:40:23 -0400
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:40:15 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: ersatz splatt <ersatzsplatt@gmail.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        "Foong, Annie" <annie.foong@intel.com>,
        "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Nadolski, Edmund" <edmund.nadolski@intel.com>,
        "Skirvin, Jeffrey D" <jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: rq_affinity doesn't seem to work?
Message-ID: <20110716024015.GA32253@infradead.org>
References: <D010E79907AF0D4E90B603DE907837D504CA6365D6@azsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <4E1CAEEB.8050506@kernel.dk>
 <20110713171011.GA11864@parisc-linux.org>
 <CAL1RGDUDbEG4ypr0GJLLi_0PTjZK0HshMVwTs=aY+=hhFdjK5g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHQAjVGK97KU0dB700WSTS1bH0YkW1_MCVaAtjR9aFQRJTcsbA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHQAjVGK97KU0dB700WSTS1bH0YkW1_MCVaAtjR9aFQRJTcsbA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by bombadil.infradead.org
	See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 04:43:44PM -0700, ersatz splatt wrote:
> I have a dual socket system with Tylersburg chipset (approximately
> Westmere I gather).
> With two Xeon X5660 packages I get this when running with more iops
> potential than the system can handle:

What HBA do you use? Does it already have a lockless ->queuecommand?