public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Allow disabling of CONFIG_DEVPORT
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 09:56:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110716075600.GA17945@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110715185519.GI8453@thunk.org>

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 02:55:19PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 04:51:32PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > 
> > But none of them are on the Signed-off-by: line area, right?
> 
> Is it really the case that your concern is that there be a whitespace
> between the bug tracker reference and the signed-off-by area?   So
> 
>      Company-bug-id: ....
> 
>      Signed-off-by: ....
> 
> is preferable to
> 
>      Company-bug-id:
>      Signed-off-by: ...
> 
> If that's your only concern, ok, whatever.  I don't personally care a
> whole lot either way.
> 
> It's not like there was ever any kind of formal standards committee
> that decided that adding "Acked-by" and "Tested-by" and "CC" were ok
> in the signed-off-by block, and other things weren't, after all.

But those were agreed apon, and standardized on, and look, documented,
as to how to use them.

If you want to propose, and document, using "Company-bug-id", that's
great, and is valid, but don't try to slip things in like this, with a
company specific name, into the standardized tag area and claim it is
acceptable after the fact.

Again, I think people here are somehow forgetting the 300+ different
companies that contribute to the kernel...

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-16  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-14 20:34 [PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Allow disabling of CONFIG_DEVPORT Mike Waychison
2011-07-14 20:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Allow disabling of sys_iopl, sys_ioperm Mike Waychison
2011-07-14 20:37   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:38     ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-14 20:40       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-18 14:35         ` Jiri Kosina
2011-07-14 22:31   ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-14 22:35     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 22:40       ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-14 22:45         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 23:03           ` Alan Cox
2011-07-14 23:04         ` Alan Cox
2011-07-20 19:42         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-14 22:42   ` Alan Cox
2011-07-14 22:48     ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-14 23:00       ` Alan Cox
2011-07-14 23:20         ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-14 23:39           ` Alan Cox
2011-07-15  0:48             ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-15  9:55               ` Alan Cox
2011-07-15 18:13               ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-15 18:14                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-15 22:30                   ` Andrew G. Morgan
2011-07-15 22:42                     ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-17 23:19                       ` Eric Paris
2011-07-18  0:04                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 21:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Allow disabling of CONFIG_DEVPORT Greg KH
2011-07-14 22:17   ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-15  6:41     ` Greg KH
2011-07-15 13:13       ` Theodore Tso
2011-07-15 14:51         ` Greg KH
2011-07-15 14:58           ` Alan Cox
2011-07-15 15:19             ` Greg KH
2011-07-15 16:45               ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-15 17:01                 ` Greg KH
2011-07-15 17:51                   ` Mike Waychison
2011-07-15 18:10                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-15 18:50             ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-15 18:55           ` Ted Ts'o
2011-07-16  7:56             ` Greg KH [this message]
2011-07-16 13:05               ` Ted Ts'o
2011-07-16 16:38                 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110716075600.GA17945@suse.de \
    --to=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox