public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:14:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201107162114.09441.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110717000815.c83755be9598d34ac8431908@canb.auug.org.au>

On Saturday 16 July 2011 16:08:15 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> The pci-current tree lost its build failure.
> 
> The arm-soc tree has complex conflicts against the arm tree so I have
> dropped it for today.

Sorry about that. I was notified of this before, but didn't get to cleanly
redo the tree yet. The problem was that I first tried to merge the for-next
branch of the ARM tree into the arm-soc master branch, but I couldn't find\
a way to deal with the arm-soc tree getting rebased.

I now plan to start a new arm-soc/for-next branch that will have the same
contents but also gets rebased. I'll let you know when I get there.

	Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-16 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-16 14:08 linux-next: Tree for July 16 Stephen Rothwell
2011-07-16 14:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-07-16 18:57 ` linux-next: Tree for July 16 (kvm) Randy Dunlap
2011-07-18  8:20   ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-16 19:03 ` linux-next: Tree for July 16 (acpi/apei) Randy Dunlap
2011-07-16 22:16   ` [PATCH] ACPI: APEI build fix Len Brown
2011-07-16 23:45     ` Randy Dunlap
2011-07-16 19:10 ` linux-next: Tree for July 16 (bcma) Randy Dunlap
2011-07-16 19:14 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-07-16 19:14 ` linux-next: Tree for July 16 (net/bnx2x) Randy Dunlap
2011-07-16 20:24   ` Dmitry Kravkov
2011-07-16 20:26     ` David Miller
2011-07-16 20:30       ` Dmitry Kravkov
2011-07-16 20:36         ` David Miller
2011-07-16 21:01         ` Randy Dunlap
2011-07-16 19:17 ` linux-next: Tree for July 16 (tpm) Randy Dunlap
2011-07-16 19:25 ` [PATCH -next] watchdog: hpwdt depends on PCI Randy Dunlap
2011-07-18 16:40   ` Mingarelli, Thomas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-16  7:17 linux-next: Tree for July 16 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-16  7:48 ` Al Viro
2012-07-16  7:54   ` Sedat Dilek
2012-07-16  7:56     ` Sedat Dilek
2012-07-16  8:31       ` Al Viro
2009-07-16  7:20 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-16 13:50 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-16 18:15 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-07-17  7:17   ` Tino Keitel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201107162114.09441.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox