public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
	dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
	patches@linaro.org, greearb@candelatech.com, edt@aei.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/7] rcu: decrease rcu_report_exp_rnp coupling with scheduler
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:54:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110720045414.GC2400@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311129618.5345.2.camel@twins>

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:40:18AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 17:18 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > @@ -696,8 +696,10 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
> >         raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
> >         for (;;) {
> >                 if (!sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp))
> > +                       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> >                         break;
> 
> I bet that'll all work much better if you wrap it in curly braces like:
> 
> 		if (!sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp)) {
> 			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> 			break;
> 		}
> 
> That might also explain those explosions Ed and Ben have been seeing.

Indeed.  Must be the call of the snake.  :-(

Thank you for catching this!

> >                 if (rnp->parent == NULL) {
> > +                       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> >                         wake_up(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq);
> >                         break;
> >                 }
> > @@ -707,7 +709,6 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
> >                 raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled */
> >                 rnp->expmask &= ~mask;
> >         }
> > -       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> >  } 

So this time I am testing the exact patch series before resending.
In the meantime, here is the updated version of this patch.

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

rcu: decrease rcu_report_exp_rnp coupling with scheduler

PREEMPT_RCU read-side critical sections blocking an expedited grace
period invoke rcu_report_exp_rnp().  When the last such critical section
has completed, rcu_report_exp_rnp() invokes the scheduler to wake up the
task that invoked synchronize_rcu_expedited() -- needlessly holding the
root rcu_node structure's lock while doing so, thus needlessly providing
a way for RCU and the scheduler to deadlock.

This commit therefore releases the root rcu_node structure's lock before
calling wake_up().

Reported-by: Ed Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 75113cb..6abef3c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -695,9 +695,12 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
 	for (;;) {
-		if (!sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp))
+		if (!sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp)) {
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
 			break;
+		}
 		if (rnp->parent == NULL) {
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
 			wake_up(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq);
 			break;
 		}
@@ -707,7 +710,6 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
 		raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled */
 		rnp->expmask &= ~mask;
 	}
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
 }
 
 /*

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-20  4:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-20  0:17 [PATCH rcu/urgent 0/6] Fixes for RCU/scheduler/irq-threads trainwreck Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20  0:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/7] rcu: decrease rcu_report_exp_rnp coupling with scheduler Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20  2:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20  4:54     ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-07-20 11:23       ` Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-20 11:31         ` Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-20 12:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 13:23         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20  0:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 2/7] rcu: Fix RCU_BOOST race handling current->rcu_read_unlock_special Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20  0:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 3/7] rcu: Streamline code produced by __rcu_read_unlock() Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20  0:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 4/7] rcu: protect __rcu_read_unlock() against scheduler-using irq handlers Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 12:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 13:25     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20  0:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 5/7] sched: Add irq_{enter,exit}() to scheduler_ipi() Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20  0:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 6/7] softirq,rcu: Inform RCU of irq_exit() activity Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20  0:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 7/7] signal: align __lock_task_sighand() irq disabling and RCU Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20  1:10 ` [PATCH rcu/urgent 0/6] Fixes for RCU/scheduler/irq-threads trainwreck Ben Greear
2011-07-20  1:30 ` Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-20  2:07   ` Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-20  4:44     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20  5:03       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-20 13:34         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 17:02           ` Ben Greear
2011-07-20 17:15             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:44               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-20 18:52                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 19:01                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 19:25                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 20:06                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 19:02                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-20 19:29                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 19:39                       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-20 19:57                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-20 20:33                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 20:54                             ` Ben Greear
2011-07-20 21:12                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-21  3:25                                 ` Ben Greear
2011-07-21 16:04                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 21:04                           ` [GIT PULL] RCU fixes for v3.0 Ingo Molnar
2011-07-20 21:55                             ` Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-20 22:06                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 20:08                         ` [PATCH rcu/urgent 0/6] Fixes for RCU/scheduler/irq-threads trainwreck Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 21:05                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 21:39                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 10:49       ` Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-20 18:25 ` [PATCH rcu/urgent 0/7 v2] " Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:26   ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/7] rcu: decrease rcu_report_exp_rnp coupling with scheduler Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:26   ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 2/7] rcu: Fix RCU_BOOST race handling current->rcu_read_unlock_special Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:26   ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 3/7] rcu: Streamline code produced by __rcu_read_unlock() Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 22:44     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-21  5:09       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:26   ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 4/7] rcu: protect __rcu_read_unlock() against scheduler-using irq handlers Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:26   ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 5/7] sched: Add irq_{enter,exit}() to scheduler_ipi() Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:26   ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 6/7] softirq,rcu: Inform RCU of irq_exit() activity Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:26   ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 7/7] signal: align __lock_task_sighand() irq disabling and RCU Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110720045414.GC2400@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=edt@aei.ca \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox