From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751606Ab1GTNCY (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:02:24 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:36501 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751302Ab1GTNCX (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:02:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:02:21 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 20 Message-ID: <20110720130220.GA2406@sirena.org.uk> References: <20110720180041.5774ca335e6697c17374dca5@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110720180041.5774ca335e6697c17374dca5@canb.auug.org.au> X-Cookie: Formatted to fit your screen. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:00:41PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > The regmap tree lost its conflict. What was the conflict, OOI? I didn't notice anything.