From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ed Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
patches@linaro.org, greearb@candelatech.com,
edward.tomlinson@aero.bombardier.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/7] rcu: decrease rcu_report_exp_rnp coupling with scheduler
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:23:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110720132311.GE2400@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201107200723.33819.edt@aei.ca>
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 07:23:32AM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 July 2011 00:54:15 Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:40:18AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 17:18 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Paul/Peter,
>
> With all 7 fixes applied with the above version of patch 1, I get a warning during boot:
>
> [ 3.443140] EXT4-fs (sdc3): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
> [ 3.456097] VFS: Mounted root (ext4 filesystem) readonly on device 8:35.
> [ 3.469734] devtmpfs: mounted
> [ 3.478488] Freeing unused kernel memory: 628k freed
> [ 3.488590] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 10240k
> [ 3.500809] Freeing unused kernel memory: 468k freed
> [ 3.514158] Freeing unused kernel memory: 1240k freed
> [ 3.552337] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 3.553004] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 3.553004] WARNING: at kernel/rcutree_plugin.h:414 __rcu_read_unlock+0xc9/0x120()
> [ 3.553004] Hardware name: System Product Name
> [ 3.553004] Modules linked in:
> [ 3.553004] Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 3.0.0-rcr-crc+ #342
> [ 3.553004] Call Trace:
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff8104b00f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff8104b06a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff810bb479>] __rcu_read_unlock+0xc9/0x120
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff8157d6b1>] __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x91/0xb0
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff8157d620>] ? notifier_call_chain+0x80/0x80
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff812c5860>] ? bit_putcs+0x5b0/0x5b0
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff8157d6e6>] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff813203c9>] notify_write+0x29/0x30
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff81322024>] vt_console_print+0x164/0x3b0
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff8104b29e>] __call_console_drivers+0x8e/0xb0
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff8104b30a>] _call_console_drivers+0x4a/0x80
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff8104b9ed>] console_unlock+0xfd/0x210
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff8104c246>] vprintk+0x3f6/0x530
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff810bb479>] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0xc9/0x120
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff8157585c>] printk+0x41/0x45
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff810bb479>] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0xc9/0x120
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff8104afcd>] warn_slowpath_common+0x3d/0xc0
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff8104b06a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff810bb479>] __rcu_read_unlock+0xc9/0x120
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff8103fed8>] cpuacct_charge+0xc8/0xe0
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff8103fe58>] ? cpuacct_charge+0x48/0xe0
> [ 3.553004] [<ffffffff810326b7>] ? task_of+0x97/0xd0
The WARN_ON_ONCE() is no longer correct. Here is a patch that goes
on top of #4 that fixes it. The bug is in the warning, so if you are
running stably with all seven fixes and only get this warning, then that
is a -very- good sign!
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fix warning to allow for negative values of ->rcu_read_lock_nesting.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index cb33705..2b5f3e1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -411,7 +411,11 @@ void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
- WARN_ON_ONCE(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_lock_nesting) < 0);
+ {
+ int rrln = ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_lock_nesting);
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rrln < 0 && rrln < INT_MIN / 2);
+ }
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_unlock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-20 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-20 0:17 [PATCH rcu/urgent 0/6] Fixes for RCU/scheduler/irq-threads trainwreck Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 0:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/7] rcu: decrease rcu_report_exp_rnp coupling with scheduler Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 2:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 4:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 11:23 ` Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-20 11:31 ` Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-20 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 13:23 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-07-20 0:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 2/7] rcu: Fix RCU_BOOST race handling current->rcu_read_unlock_special Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 0:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 3/7] rcu: Streamline code produced by __rcu_read_unlock() Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 0:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 4/7] rcu: protect __rcu_read_unlock() against scheduler-using irq handlers Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 13:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 0:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 5/7] sched: Add irq_{enter,exit}() to scheduler_ipi() Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 0:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 6/7] softirq,rcu: Inform RCU of irq_exit() activity Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 0:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 7/7] signal: align __lock_task_sighand() irq disabling and RCU Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 1:10 ` [PATCH rcu/urgent 0/6] Fixes for RCU/scheduler/irq-threads trainwreck Ben Greear
2011-07-20 1:30 ` Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-20 2:07 ` Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-20 4:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 5:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-20 13:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 17:02 ` Ben Greear
2011-07-20 17:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-20 18:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 19:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 19:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 20:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 19:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-20 19:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 19:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-20 19:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-20 20:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 20:54 ` Ben Greear
2011-07-20 21:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-21 3:25 ` Ben Greear
2011-07-21 16:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 21:04 ` [GIT PULL] RCU fixes for v3.0 Ingo Molnar
2011-07-20 21:55 ` Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-20 22:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 20:08 ` [PATCH rcu/urgent 0/6] Fixes for RCU/scheduler/irq-threads trainwreck Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 21:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 21:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 10:49 ` Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-20 18:25 ` [PATCH rcu/urgent 0/7 v2] " Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/7] rcu: decrease rcu_report_exp_rnp coupling with scheduler Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 2/7] rcu: Fix RCU_BOOST race handling current->rcu_read_unlock_special Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 3/7] rcu: Streamline code produced by __rcu_read_unlock() Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 22:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-21 5:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 4/7] rcu: protect __rcu_read_unlock() against scheduler-using irq handlers Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 5/7] sched: Add irq_{enter,exit}() to scheduler_ipi() Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 6/7] softirq,rcu: Inform RCU of irq_exit() activity Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 18:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 7/7] signal: align __lock_task_sighand() irq disabling and RCU Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110720132311.GE2400@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edt@aei.ca \
--cc=edward.tomlinson@aero.bombardier.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox