public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Crash in schedule path after worker thread dies
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:06:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110720180655.GA27115@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110720170717.GF9924@mtj.dyndns.org>

Hello Tejun,

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 07:07:17PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:07:38PM -0700, Todd Poynor wrote:
> > After a worker thread died due to a bug in a work function, a NULL
> > dereference was seen when schedule calls wq_worker_sleeping calls
> > kthread_data:
> > 
> >           return to_kthread(task)->data;
> > 
> > mm_release has apparently already set the task's vfork_done = NULL,
> > causing to_kthread to return a bad address (on 3.0-rc7 on ARM).
> > [...]
> 
> Hmmm... the scheduler code is oopsing after the worker already oopsed,
> escalating the failure mode, right?  Avoiding the scheduler oops can
> be done simply by clearing PF_WQ_WORKER in do_exit(); however, it
> would still leave workqueue code assuming the worker is busy running
> and may lead to workqueue stall.

Right, the worker oops took out that thread (don't know if
workqueue processing would have gracefully recovered if not for the
scheduler oops), but the scheduler oops was catastrophic.

> Cleaning that up would require more code but at that point it isn't
> really clear what we would be buying with the added complexity.
> Hmmm... maybe it would still be worthwhile to at least keep scheduler
> working.  Something like this?
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> index 6c7fbbe..412ead0 100644
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -915,6 +915,7 @@ NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long code)
>  	 * kernel address.
>  	 */
>  	set_fs(USER_DS);
> +	tsk->flags &= ~PF_WQ_WORKER;
>  
>  	ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT, code);

Sounds good to me, thanks!

Todd

>  
> -- 
> tejun

      reply	other threads:[~2011-07-20 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-20  0:07 Crash in schedule path after worker thread dies Todd Poynor
2011-07-20 17:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-20 18:06   ` Todd Poynor [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110720180655.GA27115@google.com \
    --to=toddpoynor@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox