From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752773Ab1GUPry (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:47:54 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:47426 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752348Ab1GUPrv (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:47:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:47:48 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Shawn Guo Cc: ashishj3 , arnd@arndb.de, Dajun , sameo@openedhand.com, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] MFD: DA9052 MFD core module v2 Message-ID: <20110721154748.GB23192@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1309876620.960.169.camel@L-0532.kpit.com> <20110721154631.GA26837@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20110721154631.GA26837@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> X-Cookie: Is this really happening? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:46:32PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:07:00PM +0530, ashishj3 wrote: > > + mutex_lock_interruptible(&da9052->io_lock); > Compile warning as below. > "warning: ignoring return value of ‘mutex_lock_interruptible’, > declared with attribute warn_unused_result" Although the bigger problem is why are these interruptible? That's very unusual.