From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753306Ab1GUQmd (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:42:33 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51537 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751296Ab1GUQmb (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:42:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:31:48 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Mikulas Patocka Cc: Zdenek Kabelac , Milan Broz , "Alasdair G. Kergon" , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] improve sysfs performance, make it O(log n) Message-ID: <20110721163148.GA31647@suse.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:56:50PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > Hi > > Here are 5 patches to make sysfs O(log n) and improve performance on > operations with many block devices. Very nice job. But can you please resend these, one per email, so that they could be applied to the tree (Documentation/SubmittingPatches describes this requirement). Also note that it is past the merge window time for patches to be accepted for 3.1, so this will remain in my "to-apply" queue until after 3.1-rc1 is out for the 3.2 merge. thanks, greg k-h