From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754654Ab1GVO4N (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:56:13 -0400 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:56396 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754566Ab1GVO4M (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:56:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:56:04 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Jiri Kosina Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: rcu: Convert trivial uses of call_rcu() to kfree_rcu() Message-ID: <20110722145604.GB2342@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20110711144643.GA4076@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 04:21:47PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Hello, Jiri! > > > > Does the patch below qualify as trivial? If so, please feel free to > > take it off my hands. ;-) > > Hi Paul! > > normally that would qualify, yes. But I can see that it's already in > linux-next, so someone beat me picking it up (well, wasn't persumably too > hard in this case). Hello, Jiri! Indeed, Ingo said that he would pull it up through -tip. Please accept my apologies for the noise! Thanx, Paul