public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] rtc: Fix hrtimer deadlock
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110722151107.e1c9996d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110722091045.476900421@linutronix.de>

On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:12:51 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> Ben reported a lockup related to rtc. The lockup happens due to:
> 
> CPU0                                        CPU1
> 
> rtc_irq_set_state()			    __run_hrtimer()	
>   spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->irq_task_lock)    rtc_handle_legacy_irq();
> 					      spin_lock(&rtc->irq_task_lock);
>   hrtimer_cancel()
>     while (callback_running);
> 
> So the running callback never finishes as it's blocked on
> rtc->irq_task_lock.  
> 
> Use hrtimer_try_to_cancel() instead and drop rtc->irq_task_lock while
> waiting for the callback. Fix this for both rtc_irq_set_state() and
> rtc_irq_set_freq().
> 
> ...
>
> +static int rtc_update_hrtimer(struct rtc_device *rtc, int enabled)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * We unconditionally cancel the timer here, because otherwise

The comment seems wrong.  If hrtimer_try_to_cancel() fails, we simply
bale out so we did not "unconditionally cancel the timer"?

> +	 * we could run into BUG_ON(timer->state != HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK);
> +	 * when we manage to start the timer before the callback
> +	 * returns HRTIMER_RESTART.
> +	 *
> +	 * We cannot use hrtimer_cancel() here as a running callback
> +	 * could be blocked on rtc->irq_task_lock and hrtimer_cancel()
> +	 * would spin forever.
> +	 */
> +	if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&rtc->pie_timer) < 0)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	if (enabled) {
> +		ktime_t period = ktime_set(0, NSEC_PER_SEC / rtc->irq_freq);
> +
> +		hrtimer_start(&rtc->pie_timer, period, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * rtc_irq_set_state - enable/disable 2^N Hz periodic IRQs
>   * @rtc: the rtc device
> @@ -651,24 +674,21 @@ int rtc_irq_set_state(struct rtc_device 
>  	int err = 0;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> +retry:
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->irq_task_lock, flags);
>  	if (rtc->irq_task != NULL && task == NULL)
>  		err = -EBUSY;
>  	if (rtc->irq_task != task)
>  		err = -EACCES;
> -	if (err)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	if (enabled) {
> -		ktime_t period = ktime_set(0, NSEC_PER_SEC/rtc->irq_freq);
> -		hrtimer_start(&rtc->pie_timer, period, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> -	} else {
> -		hrtimer_cancel(&rtc->pie_timer);
> +	if (!err) {
> +		if (rtc_update_hrtimer(rtc, enabled) < 0) {
> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc->irq_task_lock, flags);
> +			cpu_relax();
> +			goto retry;
> +		}
> +		rtc->pie_enabled = enabled;

Well this is rather nasty.  Sort of an open-coded expensive spinlock. 
All rather pointless on SMP=n builds, too.

Is there no better way, such as fixing up the locking properly?


  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-22 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-22  9:12 [patch 0/3] rtc: Assorted bug fixes Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22  9:12 ` [patch 1/3] rtc: Handle errors correctly in rtc_irq_set_state() Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22 22:04   ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-23  7:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22  9:12 ` [patch 2/3] rtc: Fix hrtimer deadlock Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22 22:11   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-07-23  7:22     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22  9:12 ` [patch 3/3] rtc: Limit frequency Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22 22:05   ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-22 22:39     ` [stable] " Willy Tarreau
2011-08-05  3:39       ` Joshua Kinard
2011-08-05  9:04         ` John Stultz
2011-08-06  7:28           ` Joshua Kinard
2011-07-23  7:17     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110722151107.e1c9996d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox