From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] rtc: Fix hrtimer deadlock
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110722151107.e1c9996d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110722091045.476900421@linutronix.de>
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:12:51 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> Ben reported a lockup related to rtc. The lockup happens due to:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
>
> rtc_irq_set_state() __run_hrtimer()
> spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->irq_task_lock) rtc_handle_legacy_irq();
> spin_lock(&rtc->irq_task_lock);
> hrtimer_cancel()
> while (callback_running);
>
> So the running callback never finishes as it's blocked on
> rtc->irq_task_lock.
>
> Use hrtimer_try_to_cancel() instead and drop rtc->irq_task_lock while
> waiting for the callback. Fix this for both rtc_irq_set_state() and
> rtc_irq_set_freq().
>
> ...
>
> +static int rtc_update_hrtimer(struct rtc_device *rtc, int enabled)
> +{
> + /*
> + * We unconditionally cancel the timer here, because otherwise
The comment seems wrong. If hrtimer_try_to_cancel() fails, we simply
bale out so we did not "unconditionally cancel the timer"?
> + * we could run into BUG_ON(timer->state != HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK);
> + * when we manage to start the timer before the callback
> + * returns HRTIMER_RESTART.
> + *
> + * We cannot use hrtimer_cancel() here as a running callback
> + * could be blocked on rtc->irq_task_lock and hrtimer_cancel()
> + * would spin forever.
> + */
> + if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&rtc->pie_timer) < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (enabled) {
> + ktime_t period = ktime_set(0, NSEC_PER_SEC / rtc->irq_freq);
> +
> + hrtimer_start(&rtc->pie_timer, period, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * rtc_irq_set_state - enable/disable 2^N Hz periodic IRQs
> * @rtc: the rtc device
> @@ -651,24 +674,21 @@ int rtc_irq_set_state(struct rtc_device
> int err = 0;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> +retry:
> spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->irq_task_lock, flags);
> if (rtc->irq_task != NULL && task == NULL)
> err = -EBUSY;
> if (rtc->irq_task != task)
> err = -EACCES;
> - if (err)
> - goto out;
> -
> - if (enabled) {
> - ktime_t period = ktime_set(0, NSEC_PER_SEC/rtc->irq_freq);
> - hrtimer_start(&rtc->pie_timer, period, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> - } else {
> - hrtimer_cancel(&rtc->pie_timer);
> + if (!err) {
> + if (rtc_update_hrtimer(rtc, enabled) < 0) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc->irq_task_lock, flags);
> + cpu_relax();
> + goto retry;
> + }
> + rtc->pie_enabled = enabled;
Well this is rather nasty. Sort of an open-coded expensive spinlock.
All rather pointless on SMP=n builds, too.
Is there no better way, such as fixing up the locking properly?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-22 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-22 9:12 [patch 0/3] rtc: Assorted bug fixes Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22 9:12 ` [patch 1/3] rtc: Handle errors correctly in rtc_irq_set_state() Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22 22:04 ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-23 7:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22 9:12 ` [patch 2/3] rtc: Fix hrtimer deadlock Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22 22:11 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-07-23 7:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22 9:12 ` [patch 3/3] rtc: Limit frequency Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22 22:05 ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-22 22:39 ` [stable] " Willy Tarreau
2011-08-05 3:39 ` Joshua Kinard
2011-08-05 9:04 ` John Stultz
2011-08-06 7:28 ` Joshua Kinard
2011-07-23 7:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110722151107.e1c9996d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox