public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] minor cleanups to EFLAGS initialisation in ret_from_fork
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:20:50 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110725182049.GD27137@sun> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110725101902.GP4362@sun>

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 02:19:02PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:58:03AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > The following series removes the use of a global kernel_eflags variable
> > from the x86_64 ret_from_fork path and (very slightly) merges the 32 and
> > 64 bit version of that code path.
> > 
> > kernel_eflags could be made a __read_mostly but actually there is no
> > reason to prefer the value at cpu_init() time to a compile time constant
> > value for the initial eflags after a fork.
> > 
> > Ian.
> > 
> 
> Thanks, Ian! I think noone against this simplification, Peter, Andi?
> 
> 	Cyrill

Ian, I've missed in first place that you've opened IRQs window _before_
schedule_tail() call, ie it's not 1:1 code mapping as it was before.

Note kernel_eflags has IF clear and what we have: the ret_from_fork on
x86-64 happens _only_ inside context_switch call, ie

schedule (sched.c)
        ...
        raw_spin_lock_irq
        ...
        context_switch
                switch_to
                        "jnz   ret_from_fork\n\t"
                        pushq_cfi kernel_eflags(%rip)
                        popfq_cfi                               # reset kernel eflags

--->                    irqs are still disabled

                        call schedule_tail                      # rdi: 'prev' task parameter
                                finish_lock_switch
                                        raw_spin_unlock_irq

I bet raw_spin_lock_irq at the beginning of the schedule() is set
for a reason and such change is not safe. Though I may be missing
something again...

	Cyrill

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-25 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-25  9:58 [PATCH 0/3] minor cleanups to EFLAGS initialisation in ret_from_fork Ian Campbell
2011-07-25 10:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: drop unnecessary kernel_eflags variable from 64 bit Ian Campbell
2011-07-25 10:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: make 64 bit ret_from_fork a little more similar to 32 bit Ian Campbell
2011-07-25 10:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: ret_from_fork: use symbolic contants for bits in EFLAGS Ian Campbell
2011-07-25 10:19 ` [PATCH 0/3] minor cleanups to EFLAGS initialisation in ret_from_fork Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-25 18:20   ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2011-07-25 21:10     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-25 21:47       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-26 14:46         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-26 15:51           ` Ian Campbell
2011-08-10 15:27           ` Ian Campbell
2011-08-10 15:35             ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110725182049.GD27137@sun \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox